FlickM Posted April 26, 2024 Author Share #21 Posted April 26, 2024 Advertisement (gone after registration) 1 hour ago, pippy said: Lovely photographs, Flick, and lovely flowers too! As far as the older 135mm lenses are concerned; I'm not sure which reviews you have read but, really, the only 135 Leitz lens whose rendering could be described as 'soft' would be the f4.5 Hektor(*). Apart from that one, though, they are all excelllent performers and most of which can be had for a very modest outlay. Have a look through this review of the 135mm f4.0 Elmar by good old Ken Rockwell. There is also a 'Compared' section in the review where you might have a look at his reviews of the other 135 lenses available (including the Hektor); https://kenrockwell.com/leica/135mm-f4.htm#compared Just out of curiosity I've had a quick peek at Peter Loy's stock list and currently he has an example of the Elmar in M mount ("Condition 4-5/E {minor dust, aperture not 100% smooth}. c.1961. Tested - produces excellent quality images") on offer for £159. FWIW if you are not after 'perfection' there is another London dealership offering a Hektor - "Smooth focusing. Noticeable internal haze inside the optics" - for the princely sum of £29... Philip. * One review of this lens said something like "Max Berek (Leitz' lens designer) named the 'Hektor' after his dog......and the lens performs in just such a fashion..."... EDIT : I forgot to say I'm delighted to read that you have resolved the issue with your vision; great to hear the contacts are working well for you! Hi Philip, I hope you are well. Thank you so much for your kind comment re the pics. I thought they were just test shots, but I've had a good response so have uploaded them to Adobe stock. It was the Hektor that I checked. There was one for sale on eBay. Now I've bought the 21mm Voigtlander, I'm going to have to wait a while before buying anything else, but a 135 is still on my list for consideration. Thanks for the comprehensive reply and info 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 26, 2024 Posted April 26, 2024 Hi FlickM, Take a look here continuing my M 262 journey. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rpsawin Posted April 28, 2024 Share #22 Posted April 28, 2024 FlickM, on the wide end look at the Zeiss Biogon 25/2.8. Very nice lens and will not break the bank. Best of luck. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted May 14, 2024 Share #23 Posted May 14, 2024 On 4/26/2024 at 1:23 PM, FlickM said: but a 135 is still on my list for consideration I was 135 on M fan for many years. Two periods: - trying without choosing one above the other, Tele-Elmar 4/135 then Elmarit 2.8/135 a- 4/135 is light and 2.8/135 with the 1.5 magnifier is a dream to use, but less so to carry b- now, for most ( 95% of use) with Apo-Summicron-M 90mm, and cropping (to 135 field) when needed, I don't use/carry 135mm lens much anymore - having choices and use when wanted/needed, I keep the two 135mm lenses and use one (5% of time) of them once in a while, they are "specialised" lenses and so cheap not good value while selling but very good use value 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeleElmar135mm Posted May 14, 2024 Share #24 Posted May 14, 2024 vor 35 Minuten schrieb a.noctilux: (...) a- 4/135 is light and 2.8/135 with the 1.5 magnifier is a dream to use, but less so to carry (...) they are "specialised" lenses and so cheap not good value while selling but very good use value totally agree! P.S. A bit pratice is needed but the rendering is beautiful. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlickM Posted May 14, 2024 Author Share #25 Posted May 14, 2024 On 4/28/2024 at 4:53 PM, rpsawin said: FlickM, on the wide end look at the Zeiss Biogon 25/2.8. Very nice lens and will not break the bank. Best of luck. Thank you Bob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlickM Posted May 14, 2024 Author Share #26 Posted May 14, 2024 6 hours ago, a.noctilux said: I was 135 on M fan for many years. Two periods: - trying without choosing one above the other, Tele-Elmar 4/135 then Elmarit 2.8/135 a- 4/135 is light and 2.8/135 with the 1.5 magnifier is a dream to use, but less so to carry b- now, for most ( 95% of use) with Apo-Summicron-M 90mm, and cropping (to 135 field) when needed, I don't use/carry 135mm lens much anymore - having choices and use when wanted/needed, I keep the two 135mm lenses and use one (5% of time) of them once in a while, they are "specialised" lenses and so cheap not good value while selling but very good use value Thank you for this. 135 isn't a focal length I use all the time, but it's useful to have that extra reach on ocassions Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now