Jump to content

I know, all speculations, but there seem to be some rumors with quite some information. Do you plan to upgrade from SL2 to SL3 or not (supposing the rumors are correct), and if so, what are the main reasons?  

153 members have voted

  1. 1. I know, all speculations, but there seem to be some rumors with quite some information. Do you plan to upgrade or not, and if, what are the main reasons?

    • I believe the SL3 is a nice upgrade, but the SL2 is still so good that I don't want to pay for the upgrade. I will keep my SL2
      64
    • Sensor and IQ is my main reason to upgrade to SL3
      25
    • AF is my main reason SL3
      35
    • other reasons which are worth for me to upgrade to SL3
      11
    • don't know yet
      31


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Chaemono said:

I changed my mind and put myself on the list. Better AWB and colors as a starting point (need some contrast and vibrance depending on the lens), better DR (I saw it at ISO 100 vs. SL2-S, David Farkas showed it at ISO 200 vs. SL2 in a video review), and the IQ with M lenses are the main reasons. I never liked the way SL cameras rendered with M lenses either due to bokeh differences (original SL) vs. M and purple fringing (SL2/-S) but the SL3 sensor is absolutely outstanding with M lenses, so much so that I would prefer to use larger M lenses on the SL3 now (plus it has IBIS). 

The Z7 was the better M IMO for M lenses 50mm and longer but I hate everything about that camera except the sensor. So it never got much use. Z7 is 675g with battery vs. 850g for SL3 but the latter comes with a much better EVF, can be operated more fluidly, and is a joy to use compared to the Z7. 

You will not be dissapointed, I am certsinly not. since S4 is still in the workings and will not be available in - let’s say - two years from now - there is plenty of time to play with the SL3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tom0511 said:

Besides IQ, I read somewhere about a slightly longer blackout when taking the image compared to SL2/SL2-s.

Did you find the same? 

Hi There Tom

This is the case, but it's likely to be sorted with firmware, and in the meantime if you put drive mode to 2frames per second and shoot single shots then there isn't any blackout. 

best

Jono

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Well, so long as the Sl 2 delivers as satisfactorily as this I see no point in changing!

John Surman Concert - Manchester Jazz Festival  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

More at https://www.ctribble.co.uk/galleries/PERFORMANCE/John_Surman_Words_Unspoken/

🙂

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As somebody mentioned earlier in the thread I too crashed my S last year which has impacted a function button and obviously the value. 

Turned out to be a good thing otherwise I may have been tempted to trade it in but I now know that I would regret it.

From what I`ve read there hasn`t been any improvements which would be of benefit to me ....notably improved AF

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Markey FWIW I used face recognition focus mode for this shoot (2 SL2 bodies + 24-90 and 90-280) and it was incredibly reliable. The only confusion came with the drummer when the algorithm mistook a high hat cymbal for a face!  Easily adjusted for.  For my work the AF on the SL2 is more than sufficient.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chris_tribble said:

@Markey FWIW I used face recognition focus mode for this shoot (2 SL2 bodies + 24-90 and 90-280) and it was incredibly reliable. The only confusion came with the drummer when the algorithm mistook a high hat cymbal for a face!  Easily adjusted for.  For my work the AF on the SL2 is more than sufficient.

An easy mistake to make  :)

Yes it is for me too .

Its just that I spend 80% of my time in the equestrian world and it can fall short when things are moving and the light is poor.

TBH I shoot in that environment for friends so I have to bring some perspective to the situation.

To that end I just don`t take those kind of shots these days

Its just frustration on my part and ignorance really because I though AF ability between brands was pretty much the same.

Right tool for the right job and all that and I should have kept the Sony for that type of shooting.

My bad .... as they say.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...