Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have struggled over the years to find anything digital that came close to the Leica M9 or M10 and small rangefinder lenses.

Used the Panasonic GX85  m4/3 with 15/1.7 and 25/1.4 'Leica' lenses, but sold the lenses when the TL2 and CL came along; perhaps a mistake as the size was great and it had IBIS. A real shame Panasonic and did not update the small form factor bodies. I keep the TL2 as a piece of art.

Tried the SL2-S; fantastic IQ and IBIS, but just too large and heavy both indoors and outdoors.

The X100V and X-T5 respectively, replaced the CL and SL2-S. The LM WR 'Fuji-lux' lenses are fantastic in IQ, as good as the 35 Summilux TL with focus speed in another league. 

I still tend to use the Leica M film or M10 and X100V more than the X-T5, so fundamentally it must be that size matters more than AF speed or resolution. 

Edited by FrozenInTime
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no digital M now, but two film Ms. Their main companion is a SL2-S or Q2. But since I think the OP was asking about alien life forms, then I have a Gandolfi (4x5, my avatar), Chroma Carbon Adventurer (4x5) and Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K (L-mount, video, but can take stills).

Edited by LocalHero1953
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sony A7R and Canon 5D MkII for digital in parallel with my M-E 240 and MM 246 cameras. I don't see a need to upgrade any time soon using this mix. The A7R comes out for macro photography (in-camera EVF and tilt screen LiveView are big advantages here) and on hikes here mostly combined with Canon 17-40/4 L EF lens and adapter. Canon 5D MkII for speedlite flash photography and when I - rarely - need to use AF support (airshows, wildlife). Still have a nice collection of Canon L lenses but stopped vesting into Canon gear after 2013 when I felt intrigued by Sony mirrorless instead which became a stepping stone for me to transition to Leica after I explored compact rangefinder lenses adapted to my Sony A7R for several years. In > 80% I am now using my Leica gear for digital photography. 

For film it is > 90 % with Leica M and my IIIc cameras, rest with Hasselblad 500 C/M and Rollei 35. I don't remember when I last used my Canon SLR for film photography!

I wish Fuji made a full-frame mirrorless camera. But since Fuji omits to this day using FF sensors, it was always an exclusion criteria for me to use their cameras. I need FF since I predominantly shoot wide and ultra-wide lenses including fisheye. 

Edited by Martin B
Link to post
Share on other sites

I neglected to answer the second part of the question back in Dec.   I find that a Lumix S5 makes a lovely backup camera for the M10-P.   I have an M to L lens adapter, but I use it primarily with my R glass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used Leica continually since 1969 and presently have the Q2, M10, M10-r, M10 Monochrom and SL2. However, I also have a Nikon D800 and D810 which I use mainly with a 600mm F4.0 Nikon lens (and 300mm F2.8 but it's presently broke) for Wildlife and Motorsport.

https://photographybytomlane.com

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...