Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Have you found any photoshop instructors who focus primarily on images coming from a monochrome camera?  What I am finding is that most start with color images nad convert to B&W (various methods).  Just curious as to various workflows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is not much difference between editing converted and Monochrom files.  One thing to remember: Don't touch the clarity slider; it creates haloes. Set your black and white point early in the process. The Dehaze slider is helpful. I mostly lift the midtones in Curves. For the rest it is mostly a matter of taste and intent. Note that ACR converts to Greyscale by default. Change that to RGB

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably also worth installing a plugin to Photoshop such as the Nik Suite with Silver Efex as this gives you some processing pre-sets and also B&W film pre-sets which you can use as starting points with your images. As @jaapv says do all your B&W work in Adobe RGB and save as TIFF files. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can change the default conversion setting in ACR by clicking on the blue text (link) under the image. An advantage of working in RGB is that you can do toning. Some plugins require RGB as well. Silver Efex is both a useful learning tool and starting point. I must confess to abandoning it years ago as I found it too aggressive. YMMV

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, marchyman said:

So he did.  Never mind  😅

It does make a difference despite laughing. Lightroom is still catching up with what can be done in Photoshop even if only a tiny fraction of the things Photoshop can do are used day-to-day or even explored in a lifetime. And if like me and many more people the OP doesn't like Lightroom it's a moot point trying to stuff it down their throat just because it 'seems' superficially similar. Lightroom didn't start as a Photoshop-Lite, it started as an entirely different concept made for the needs of entirely different photographers. It has since evolved to become more inclusive but it's abilities and management are a world away from Photoshop which has a deeper connection to a darkroom crossover past.

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/16/2023 at 10:47 PM, 250swb said:

It does make a difference despite laughing. Lightroom is still catching up with what can be done in Photoshop even if only a tiny fraction of the things Photoshop can do are used day-to-day or even explored in a lifetime. And if like me and many more people the OP doesn't like Lightroom it's a moot point trying to stuff it down their throat just because it 'seems' superficially similar. Lightroom didn't start as a Photoshop-Lite, it started as an entirely different concept made for the needs of entirely different photographers. It has since evolved to become more inclusive but it's abilities and management are a world away from Photoshop which has a deeper connection to a darkroom crossover past.

Photoshop is the closest thing I know to a digital darkroom. It requires serious dedication but it gives back in kind. For me, Lightroom is only a catalogue and a very basic starting point. 

Edited by irenedp
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...