Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

6 hours ago, Huss said:

Ok, here's the glass half full part.  At least now Leica has identified that the problem exists, and the cause of the problem.

Now how long will it take to get correctly manufactured pressure plates?

It could be quite some time, as I reported some time ago, scratched films have been identified since 2014. I think that this faulty batch of pressure plates could have been in stock for a while and have been installed in a rather random fashion which is consistent with Leica's way of working. This would explain why some cameras scratched and some didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Matlock said:

It could be quite some time, as I reported some time ago, scratched films have been identified since 2014. I think that this faulty batch of pressure plates could have been in stock for a while and have been installed in a rather random fashion which is consistent with Leica's way of working. This would explain why some cameras scratched and some didn't.

But but the M6 is made with all new parts!

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Huss said:

Well, this puts to rest the claim that it is only the vocal few that have issues, while the vast majority who do not are unheard from.

Leica has stated that a batch of pressure plates is defective.  When my camera was returned from the first attempted fix, the pressure plate had indeed been replaced. But it was replaced by another defective one! From the same batch the original one came from.

If I had a  new M6 and think it doesn't scratch the film - I'd check it again.  Actually look at your negatives.   

I follow this thread because occasionally real information trickles out from the surrounding noise, such as the statement to you from Leica.

I took your advice, but I still can't see scratches on film from my new MP. It must be my eyesight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LocalHero1953 said:

I follow this thread because occasionally real information trickles out from the surrounding noise, such as the statement to you from Leica.

I took your advice, but I still can't see scratches on film from my new MP. It must be my eyesight.

You must have got lucky and your camera has a plate from a good batch. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

32 minutes ago, lmans said:

Who says ALL new parts? Show us

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a admission that the new style laminated pressure plate with bumps and screw holes, is prone to handling damage and material catching on the screw holes and heads.

https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/306263-no-more-mechanism-perfection…/?do=findComment&comment=3910132

Why did they change away from the time proven all metal plate ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LocalHero1953 said:

I follow this thread because occasionally real information trickles out from the surrounding noise, such as the statement to you from Leica.

I took your advice, but I still can't see scratches on film from my new MP. It must be my eyesight.

Leica have stated that the cause was a defective batch of pressure plates so you will only have problems if your camera has one of those plates. Defective batches of various parts go back many years (not just with Leica). If you can't see scratches on your film you have no problems, either with your camera or your eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm...per Huss's post, clearly Leica has now identified that there IS a problem.  If there are a batch of defective pressure plates on some new M6s, I would expect Leica to notify all purchasers, informing them that they may have a camera with a defective plate and advising them how to check it and, if necessary, return it to Leica for repair.  If Leica can identify the particular cameras by serial number that received a bad plate, they could notify only those buyers.

I hope they do that; I expect that they won't. 🙄

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great camera porn but you still haven’t shown anything about ALL new parts. Doesn’t stand to reason they would differ that much from the mp or even M7 although I can see the MA is different as the body doesn’t have a giant  hole in it for a battery. But ALL new parts???? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, lmans said:

Great camera porn but you still haven’t shown anything about ALL new parts. Doesn’t stand to reason they would differ that much from the mp or even M7 although I can see the MA is different as the body doesn’t have a giant  hole in it for a battery. But ALL new parts???? 

The all new parts may have been something lost in translation and then stated to a few people, it's probably all new parts from the original M6. Similarly there was an interview where they mentioned the new M6 light meter can replace the old M6 light meters but most probably know that isn't the case. The M-A is the same aside from the removal of the electronics, right? Isn't the battery hole just covered with a plate to fill it in?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lmans said:

Great camera porn but you still haven’t shown anything about ALL new parts. Doesn’t stand to reason they would differ that much from the mp or even M7 although I can see the MA is different as the body doesn’t have a giant  hole in it for a battery. But ALL new parts???? 

The reason for the missing ‘giant hole’ is, apparently, due to a cover plate.

Have a feel, or next time you’re in hospital for an outpatients appointment get them to X-ray it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2023 at 1:35 PM, Mikep996 said:

Hmmm...it occurs to me that film scratching might be simply a matter of a few (or one) unhappy employee intentionally sabotaging some cameras.  This sort of thing is not unheard of.  Of course, Leica employees are surely pleased with their work/wages and such dissatisfaction could never happen, right? 😏

 

Why yes, of course - we live in wondrous times.  Literally anything is possible these days.

A dildo shaped UFO might land on the White House lawn and return to us v1.6.0.0 firmware installed alive and well, freeze up free Elvis Presley, Claude Monet and Joan of Arc, too.

 

Edited by Herr Barnack
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lmans said:

Great camera porn but you still haven’t shown anything about ALL new parts. Doesn’t stand to reason they would differ that much from the mp or even M7 although I can see the MA is different as the body doesn’t have a giant  hole in it for a battery. But ALL new parts???? 

Jono (a Leica beta tester) stated in his M6 preview that Leica told him that the new M6 differed from the other cameras by having 'all new parts'.

Someone else at Leica told a well known US dealer that the M6 was essentially the same camera as the MP and the differences were only cosmetic.

Without stripping down an example of each camera we'll never know for sure who is telling the truth!

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mikep996 said:

Hmm...per Huss's post, clearly Leica has now identified that there IS a problem.  If there are a batch of defective pressure plates on some new M6s, I would expect Leica to notify all purchasers, informing them that they may have a camera with a defective plate and advising them how to check it and, if necessary, return it to Leica for repair.  If Leica can identify the particular cameras by serial number that received a bad plate, they could notify only those buyers.

I hope they do that; I expect that they won't. 🙄

 

Remember how they reacted to the delaminating sensors in the M9?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I

51 minutes ago, earleygallery said:

Jono (a Leica beta tester) stated in his M6 preview that Leica told him that the new M6 differed from the other cameras by having 'all new parts'.

I would not interpret "all new parts" to mean different design. Possibly from different sub-contractors or suppliers, or even different manufacturing processes. On the other hand, I'm quite sure there are no used parts in them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lmans said:

Great camera porn but you still haven’t shown anything about ALL new parts. Doesn’t stand to reason they would differ that much from the mp or even M7 although I can see the MA is different as the body doesn’t have a giant  hole in it for a battery. But ALL new parts???? 

You're mad huh that Leica has admitted the defect is real - while before you were trying ssoooooo hard to push that it is user error.  Or a piece of grit.  Or developing.  Or just imaginary.

Now you are all hung up on the sarcastic joke about 'all new parts'. Because that to you is the real issue.  Not the fact that Leica has shipped defective cameras.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TomB_tx said:

I

I would not interpret "all new parts" to mean different design. Possibly from different sub-contractors or suppliers, or even different manufacturing processes. On the other hand, I'm quite sure there are no used parts in them.

The BS was that the initial claim was it is now all brought in house as they could no longer rely on sourcing parts.  Then I get the email from Leica saying it is a supplier issue.  Which goes against their claim when this camera was released as to its provenance.   Also, the MP and MA in the past have randomly suffered from this issue - as reported in other threads - so it really seems getting a non scratching M is the luck of the draw.

This is for cameras which cost about $5500.  You may pull the short straw and get one that scratches, and then deal with the nightmare situation of trying to get it fixed. Or you may get lucky and have one that is perfect.

I have never dealt with this before on any of my other film cameras - some which cost a few dollars, to some which are thousands of dollars.  But for Leica, this is common place.

And remember, they sent it back to me saying it was fixed!  Which they now admit is not the case.  10 weeks in on a brand new camera.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...