Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

4 minutes ago, a.noctilux said:

For now, your Nikon SLR + Leica R "solution" is not that bad, just stick with this untill you are "fit" for Leica M (expensive route).

....... Or electronic viewfinder! A Nikon D810 or D850 smacks of modern, plastic, technology......

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Shepherdphotographer said:

M240, M10 or M11,as some forum users suggested earlier, then no?

 

Well, no.  The M240/M10/M11 can only use R lenses with an electronic viewfinder (electronic Visoflex) which you have said you don't want.   Those M bodies, with the addition of the electronic viewfider, are essentially very clunky mirrorless cameras with fewer functions than the SL/SL2/SL2-S/Panasonic Lumix S1/S1R/S5.

R lenses cannot be used without either a reflex mirror housing or an electronic viewfinder.   There are no M bodies that will allow for rangefinder focus with R lenses. 

Edited by hepcat
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Well, no.  The M240/M10/M11 can only use R lenses with an electronic viewfinder (electronic Visoflex) which you have said you don't want.   Those M bodies, with the addition of the electronic viewfider, are essentially very clunky mirrorless cameras with fewer functions than the SL/SL2/SL2-S/Panasonic Lumix S1/S1R/S5.

R lenses cannot be used without either a reflex mirror housing or an electronic viewfinder.   There are no M bodies that will allow for rangefinder focus with M lenses. 

Ok, I understand

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shepherdphotographer said:

I cam'T find easily? Are they particular?

Only Leica sold the unique rechargeable batteries, and they haven't for years. Old ones are likely dead or in poor condition by now. Some third party companies can take the old batteries and install new cells, as jaapv mentions.

Unlike your Nikon, the DMR is only 10MP and has a crop sensor, so your wider lenses will no longer be wide, and you'll have to stick to low ISOs with a sensor of that vintage. If anything goes wrong with the DMR it's likely nobody can fix it - Leica won't. The only real advantages over your Leitax/Nikon are that the R8/9 can do open aperture metering and control the aperture in exposure modes that require it.

Edited by Anbaric
Link to post
Share on other sites

To sum up your needs, requirements and desires, R doesn't work with M as you wish.  R lenses have the magic you like, they are great I agree wholeheartedly.  If you want to use an M there are many third party lenses to choose, many have the qualities of R glass, classical rendering and they are reasonably priced.  Look at Voigtlander lenses or perhaps the newer Chinese lenses.  Good luck with your quest.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use te Sigma fp - with its L-mount - for ancient lenses, R lenses and M lenses.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by jankap
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shepherdphotographer said:

...... Also a Nikon Df silver, which is "vintage"!!

I had a Df for several years. They're a good body, with the D4 sensor,  but they're all plastic.  I like the Lumix S1 much better, both for "feel" and for sensor output.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shepherdphotographer said:

https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/df.htm

But a Leica M is a Leica M....... with electronic viewfinder or live view that it is........ Excuse me for the long reflection .... I close it here

There are good reasons to go with a later digital M: so long as you have M mount lenses to use the rangefinder.  You can use R mount lenses with the electronic finder occasionally, but if you're ONLY using R mount lenses, it makes for an odd, less ergonomic, and less robust camera than just using a mirrorless body for daily field use.

I understand your desire to use your current set of lenses with a digital M body, but it just isn't a practical setup for regular use.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hepcat said:

There are good reasons to go with a later digital M: so long as you have M mount lenses to use the rangefinder.  You can use R mount lenses with the electronic finder occasionally, but if you're ONLY using R mount lenses, it makes for an odd, less ergonomic, and less robust camera than just using a mirrorless body for daily field use.

I understand your desire to use your current set of lenses with a digital M body, but it just isn't a practical setup for regular use.

It's my damnation.....!!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hepcat said:

I had a Df for several years. They're a good body, with the D4 sensor,  but they're all plastic.  I like the Lumix S1 much better, both for "feel" and for sensor output.

Df is built to withstand the harshest conditions, the camera features tough yet lightweight magnesium alloy top, bottom and rear shells and is capable of withstanding all weather conditions to the same level as Nikon's D-SLR D800, ensuring a better resistance to humidity and dust.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Shepherdphotographer said:

Df is built to withstand the harshest conditions, the camera features tough yet lightweight magnesium alloy top, bottom and rear shells and is capable of withstanding all weather conditions to the same level as Nikon's D-SLR D800, ensuring a better resistance to humidity and dust.

That doesn't mean it still doesn't feel 'plasticky.'   And it does.   As I said, I had one for about four years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...