Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The BC is E43, while the regular one is E46, so it's highly unlikely that they are "exactly" the same...

In terms of overall rendering? Yes, close enough. I never compared them side-by-side and I don't have the regular version anymore.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 1 Stunde schrieb Leslie22:

Does anyone have an opinion on the Brass , black Crome version of the 50 Lux. Is it "exactly" tyre same optically as the regular version etc , Thanks

They are optically the same.

Vignetting wide open is different which leads to a slightly different look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they only made 500 of these? Seems like they are making more as it's still available new?

I remember reading an article and it saying that it was optically the same just the outside more vintage design. I own it and like the feel, the weight and am a fan of the scalloped focus ring. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2022 at 1:28 AM, anickpick said:

They are optically the same.

Vignetting wide open is different which leads to a slightly different look.

Fred Miranda tested both and found no difference in vignetting.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 6 Stunden schrieb hdmesa:

Fred Miranda tested both and found no difference in vignetting.

The transition is smoother with the standard lens.

First one standard lens / second one black chrome:

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, anickpick said:

The transition is smoother with the standard lens.

First one standard lens / second one black chrome:

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Not so easy to compare these pictures, because the WB, and partly the angle, is different. But I've had both lenses too, and share the experience – the pictures from the standard version feel a little smoother than the BC. But I'm not sure if it's just something I believe, because the tactile experience is different (the BC has a tighter user experience, and maybe that leads me to believe that the pictures are "tighter" as well).

Edited by evikne
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 1 Stunde schrieb evikne:

Not so easy to compare these pictures, because the WB, and partly the angle, is different. But I've had both lenses too, and share the experience – the pictures from the standard version feel a little smoother than the BC. But I'm not sure if it's just something I believe, because the tactile experience is different (the BC has a tighter user experience, and maybe that leads me to believe that the pictures are "tighter" as well).

It's only in the very far corners where the two lenses differ in terms of vignetting. There is no difference in optical performance otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, anickpick said:

It's only in the very far corners where the two lenses differ in terms of vignetting. There is no difference in optical performance otherwise.

Was there a filter on them or where they both shot bare? Was the hood attached to the BC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, anickpick said:

good point. Both had a B+W xs-pro clear filter / no hood.

Hmm, so could be the BC's narrower snoot doesn't accept filters quite as well without some minor vignetting. If so, that also could mean slightly decreased corner sharpness if the filter is still in the way at infinity focus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...