Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, Aryel said:

Walking around looking for rodinal subjects to finish the roll quickly :D

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

minolta cle, Rollei 40f2.8, sfx200 in rodinal 1:50

Out of pure curiosity, what is a Rodinal subject?

My use of Rodinal is usually because I don't object to a bit of defined grain, or because I need to heavily push process a film.

Mostly I use Xtol for the 'finer' look it produces, but some of my best picturs (IMO) are actually processed in Rodinal. Says something about the subjects I hunt for. 😉

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, erl said:

Out of pure curiosity, what is a Rodinal subject?

No idea, but anything anyone wants it to be sounds good to me. It was just a joke 🙃.

So far, I tried kids and back of a truck. It worked for both 😉

Edited by Aryel
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another one from the sfx200, m3 and the rollei planar 80. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


My impression is that the shadows are quite unforgiving and I have to be more cautious with exposure (not just with rodinal)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're seeing some of the Rodinal contrast there, and given both the cat is jet black and the railings are white, changing exposure will help one but not the other. Using the Rodinal more dilute, and agitating more gently would be the only way out , culminating in the extreme of 1+100 semi-stand (unless you choose to use a different developer!)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrism said:

You're seeing some of the Rodinal contrast there, and given both the cat is jet black and the railings are white, changing exposure will help one but not the other. Using the Rodinal more dilute, and agitating more gently would be the only way out , culminating in the extreme of 1+100 semi-stand (unless you choose to use a different developer!)

This makes a lot of sense. Thanks a lot for pointing this out. I will give this a try next time I have high contrast scenes.

I want to stick to Rodinal (and ddx) for now: learning quite a lot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Juice Time

Minolta cle, summaron-m 28, sfx 200 (rodinal 1+50)

I like the sfx200 results actually. I will try more in the future 🙂

I am planning to try trix in 1:50 again as well but reducing the agitation further. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Minolta cle, Rollei 40f2.8, sfx200 (rodinal 1:50)

I think the 1:50 dilution helped to save the sky. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the ingredients listed in The Darkroom Cookbook to make my own Rodinal, but have not done so yet.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried some trix in 1:50 for 13 minutes. Did gentle inversions for 30 seconds and 1 inversion every 2 minutes after.  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

M3, summicron rigid, trix 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steve Ricoh said:

Underexpose the negs, then hot development at 1+50 (or 1+25) might by the trick for pronounced grain. Thoughts?

Hot development I don’t know but underexposed I really think so. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


m2, summilux 35pre-asph, trix (1:50)

This was with gentle inversion for 30 sec then 1 inversion every two minutes. 

Edited by Aryel
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Aryel said:

Hot development I don’t know but underexposed I really think so. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


m2, summilux 35pre-asph, trix (1:50)

This was with gentle inversion for 30 sec then 1 inversion every two minutes. 

Nice grain!
What duration was that, If you remember?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steve Ricoh said:

hat duration was that, If you remember?

Same as the cat above, both rolls were developed together, 13 minutes. Just in case, shutter speed was 1/15. 

Here another one where I like the grain a lot from the same roll:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

m2, summilux pre-asph

I could be wrong, but I think the main difference is that for the cats, I metered using incident in a shadow areas. For the one with the umbrella, I metered the full scene with a small reflective meter on top of the camera.

I developed only 6 rolls in rodinal so far so better take it with a pinch of salt 😊.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I tried a roll of Rollei Retro 400s. 20.5 minutes, inversions for the first 30 seconds and then 1 inversion every 2 minutes. 

These are ‘every day’ shots. I like this look a lot 😊

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

From the same roll

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!



Same as above 
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2021 at 8:54 PM, Ornello said:

........ I do not for the life of me understand why anyone uses it.

 I've used it for years. Most often with 120 Tri-X in Rodinal 1:50 (not stand) with a Hasselblad 503cw and Zeiss lenses.

It's a combination I like.  That's why I use it.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...