Jipster Posted August 25, 2023 Share #221 Posted August 25, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 5/11/2022 at 2:38 AM, ALLinONE said: I have three emulation packages. These are not presets, but corrective LUTs superimposed on the base profile. But again, this is a low-quality product not worth the money. And I know what I say, as I have experience in building profiles. beg to differ. Don’t use all of their profiles, but your rash statement speaks volumes. These are not low-quality products. Maybe you can give us a link to one of your profiles, so we can compare. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 Hi Jipster, Take a look here Superb new camera profiles and camera & film emulation presets (Cobalt-Image). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ALLinONE Posted August 25, 2023 Share #222 Posted August 25, 2023 Here are some of my photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/154108410@N07/ - all have only my profile applied. Only fuji s5pro has the original color from the native utility. I have never used profiles from cobalt, even though I always try them with updates - money in the wind.... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tivoli Posted August 27, 2023 Share #223 Posted August 27, 2023 (edited) I came upon this thread yesterday. I've already purchased four products, each one hours apart, starting with the basic Q2 profiles. I think they are fantastic. These appear to be extremely high quality and have properties and features that I have not been able to replicate with other products up to now. I'm very excited by the output of my images especially the comparison between the C1 Leica Q2 generic profile and Cobalt's profiles. These products are a game changer for me. Edited August 27, 2023 by tivoli Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summi-cron Posted September 17, 2023 Share #224 Posted September 17, 2023 (edited) On 8/25/2023 at 9:25 AM, ALLinONE said: Here are some of my photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/154108410@N07/ Hello Allinone, wonderful! How do you get those colors? Is it possible to have your profile? Thank you Dan Edited September 17, 2023 by summi-cron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almizilero Posted January 9, 2024 Share #225 Posted January 9, 2024 Does Cobalt offer some kind of trial version? I really would like to test this for my M10 before I buy? I also need help understanding how it works. First I get the Basic Pack which will get the best out of the DNG (or what cobalt deems the best). Then I can add simulations. Let's say I want to get same-ish images from an SL2-S and a Pana S5II. Is it enough to get the Basic Packs for both cameras, because Cobalt has a standard and their basic pack brings all cameras to this level? Or do I have to get the Basic Packs and the SL2-S simulation, with which I'll bring the S5II as close as possible to the SL2-S? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 9, 2024 Share #226 Posted January 9, 2024 As said before. If you want (nearly) the same colour output from two different cameras the best thing to do is to shoot a ColorChecker Passport on both cameras and load the profiles into your raw converter. Cobalt profiles are basically meant for single camera use or film emulation. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raamiel Posted January 9, 2024 Share #227 Posted January 9, 2024 Advertisement (gone after registration) 3 hours ago, jaapv said: As said before. If you want (nearly) the same colour output from two different cameras the best thing to do is to shoot a ColorChecker Passport on both cameras and load the profiles into your raw converter. Cobalt profiles are basically meant for single camera use or film emulation. The architecture of Cobalt's basic profiles is designed precisely for this purpose: to unify the output among different cameras. This allows us to have a common base on which to apply our emulation LUTs. Of course, if a user has the tools to build good profiles specifically tailored to their cameras, this could lead to even more consistent results, eliminating the inevitable small variations between camera units. However, it is a more challenging task than one might think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_murray Posted January 11, 2024 Share #228 Posted January 11, 2024 I think people who are connected to commercial products like Cobalt should declare their interest, so that forum members are properly informed. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hansvons Posted January 12, 2024 Share #229 Posted January 12, 2024 On 1/9/2024 at 5:31 PM, Raamiel said: However, it is a more challenging task than one might think. Yes. And that's because there are lenses in the equation. And they differ quite a lot from outright cold and magenta-ish (vintage Zeiss glass) to coldish but relatively neutral (older Leica glass), to reasonably neutral (modern Leica and other glass), to warm (e.g., much of Canon glass has a warm bias). Similar things can be said about contrast, etc. When not using the lens used for calibration, the odds are high that the whole exercise is moot. What you can do, however, is match cameras after the fact with a Macbeth chart that was used in the same light(environment). But who wants to be so anal? Profiles like Cobalt and many others, including C1's ProStandard, can give you a ballpark you might prefer. The rest is marketing. They even don't tell you which lens they used for "calibration". 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now