Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just got a Fujifilm xe1 from a garage sale, paid US$100, tested with Leica Elmar 135mm.

The raw has very low contrast, I have to boost the contrast and vibrant and saturation. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Einst_Stein
add photo
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, frame-it said:

135 f4 ?

Yes, the first non-tele version. It is windy,  so focus is bad. Nothing to do  with its sharpness. I just like the colors, call it impressionism imitation if you will.

Edited by Einst_Stein
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Einst,

Nice photos.

Did you try it at F8 & F11 on a sturdy tripod? At the time that this lens was designed many people thought that 135mm lenses were at their best between about 15 & 20 meters/45 & 60 feet. Quite good at longer distances also.

Note the tripod mount on the bottom of the lens.

The lens head also unscrews & this becomes a very good lens with a Visoflex & a Bellows or with a Visoflex & Extension Tubes & a Close Focusing Mount.

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Geschlecht said:

Hello Einst,

Nice photos.

Did you try it at F8 & F11 on a sturdy tripod? At the time that this lens was designed many people thought that 135mm lenses were at their best between about 15 & 20 meters/45 & 60 feet. Quite good at longer distances also.

Note the tripod mount on the bottom of the lens.

The lens head also unscrews & this becomes a very good lens with a Visoflex & a Bellows or with a Visoflex & Extension Tubes & a Close Focusing Mount.

Michael

I didn't know the head can be unscrewed, really? thanks for the info. 

I rarely shoot it at f11. I will try it. what should I expect? For the above pictures, tripods helps very little as it was the wind. I like this lens very much, in fact it is my first Leica lens when I got my M9. I got it dirt cheap from Tarmakin, I think it was US$149. 

This lens was by nature not very contrasty, nevertheless very sharp. But I think my copy may need some cleaning to recover to the original condition, , though I don't see any obvious haze. 

  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I unscrewed the lens head, did some minor cleaning.

H'ere''re some test shots. Straight out of cameras into LR. No adjust.

They are: f4/ISDO200; F5.6/ISO400. F8/ISO800,  F11/ISO600, F16/ISO3200

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the f4/ISO200 converted to B&W.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Einst_Stein
Link to post
Share on other sites

Security concerns limit most photography in shopping malls, which are private property. It has little to do with size of equipment. Smart phones are ĺess intrusive apart from being more in evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Elmar 135mm @f/4.0 APS-C cropped, OOC

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

My Tele-Elmar 1:4/135 is one of my go-to lenses! Razor sharp, heavy and somewhat challenging to focus. But cheap!

On a Z7 due to my poor eyesight. F:8.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by markhout
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wda said:

Security concerns limit most photography in shopping malls, which are private property. It has little to do with size of equipment. Smart phones are ĺess intrusive apart from being more in evidence.

In reality, it depends on your camera, and lens, and how you shoot.

In the area I live, regardless their rules, you'll be fine with smart phone or unsuspicious P&S. Even a Hasselblad 500CM with film back is fine now (not in the past). Digital back is still no-no.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

M10r.  Zihuatanejo, mx

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...