Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone,

I had a look around but I can’t  find this information: I have a Summicron 50mm v5 silver chrome and when I look at the diaphragm closing from the back of the lens I see what looks like a second diaphragm closing together with the main one. Is it an extension of the 8 normal blades? A second set of blades? If so, to what purpose?

It doesn’t seem to be an extension of the front blades, I don’t see how that could be given the profile, but I might be wrong.

What am I seeing?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the 50/2 Summicron v5 anymore but I don't remember it having what you're describing.  Does it look any different from the diaphragm in the final picture at this link?

The blades have an angle about halfway up and then finish in a curve so could it be an optical illusion created by the shape of the blades perhaps?  Or a reflection in the front group of elements even?  (Clutching at straws here.:blink:)

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an illusion. Although it has fooled me into thinking there were two sets of blades for years - until your question drove me to do some research.

It is due to the actual complete shape of the aperture blades in M-Mount lenses (among some others).

Which is....... L-shaped, roughly.

The overlapping twin legs of the L give the impression of a "second aperture" with a slightly larger diameter than the actual diameter, closing in on almost identical at the smallest f/stop, as the "Ls" swing in from the corner pivot point.

Here is a very rough schematic of how the illusion is formed - with each aperture blade in a different color to make the "Ls" more distinct.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I can confirm the visual effect with virtually all my M-mount lenses: CV 75 f/1.5 and 35 f/1.4 II, 28 Elmarit v.3, 75 APO-Summicron, 90 Summicron v.3, 21 Elmarit-M, 135 Tele-Elmar. My 90mm TE blades are too scuffed to be sure.

I suspect the interesting "L" shape used by Leitz/Leica and Cosina has something to do with fitting the blades into as compact a lens barrel as possible (for the given max. aperture speed). They can be seen in real life here.

https://sites.google.com/site/kameraque/home/bokeh-king-is-naked-repairing-leica-summicron-35mm-pre-asph

Edited by adan
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, adan said:

It is due to the actual complete shape of the aperture blades in M-Mount lenses (among some others).

Which is....... L-shaped, roughly.

Andy, learning from you as usual. Thank you.

You got me looking in the back of many lenses and indeed you are right, I have no idea why it didn't occur to me to check the other ones! I guess I took it for granted that it wouldn't be the case with those. But most of them are indeed the same, CV and Leica.

It is quite striking though how much it looks like a second set, it seems impossible that the blades would create four layers by being superimposed this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...