Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've seen conflicting reports of ISO50 being a native base vs camera trickery; and therefore ISO100 being the true native base. Has anybody worked out whether 50 or 100 is lowest native ISO?

If 100, I'm expecting 50 would result in a loss of Dynamic Range?

Edited by w44neg
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no objection to using ISO 50, according to the chart on PhotonstoPhotos.  As you see, it will gain you one stop of DR over ISO 100.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jaapv said:

I see no objection to using ISO 50, according to the chart on PhotonstoPhotos.  As you see, it will gain you one stop of DR over ISO 100.

Interesting results, thanks. This clears up my question, although for FF, it seems a low dynamic range. In reality, It seems to cover a broader amount of stops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, this is the correct photographic DR. The normally quoted number includes DR that is unusable because of noise. This is the most reliable site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jaapv said:

No, this is the correct photographic DR. The normally quoted number includes DR that is unusable because of noise. This is the most reliable site.

Ah interesting. I’ve never trusted DXO so this makes sense 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...