Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi,

There are many options of 50mm out there. It's hard to choose.
I've narrowed it down a bit.

F2 is fine. I'd like so stay relatively modern but doesn't have to be coded.

I would be using this on an M6 and possible M10 (which I haven't gotten yet).

My first choice would be a leica lens, but I know there are some other good brands out there as well. I'd rather not have the quirky 1.5 (zeiss?) lens that need to be back focused wide open.

Suggestions/experiences  please.

Thanks,
Mike

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each 50mm is a good choice, for some times or something anyway.

 

Myself, after using/trying dozens of 50mm for decades of M using, my last choice is the modest but so nice

Summarit-M 2.5/50mm my now favorite,

even if I do keep some other 50mm (larger/bigger/lighter/focussing closer/triple-focal/ etc.) when I need.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just bought a used Summicron V, it should arrive tomorrow 🙏 It's my first 50mm Rangefinder ever. I initially asked opinions in this thread about these new lenses:

Leica Summarit, Zeiss Planar, and Voigtlander Nokton's. With the huge help of the community, I  finally decided for one of the best 50mm in the world.

There are many tips and feedbacks in the thread. I can't help you more than this because I'm a Leica newbie, all I needed to know was in the thread 🙂

Good luck 

Edited by Dennis
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd pretty much just echo what's been said before.

If you want f2.0 I'd go for the Version IV or V Summicron; if f2.4 / f2.5 is fine then the Summarits are superb small, light and more modern lenses.

Philip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't indicate what type of rendering you like, what you tend to shoot most, or your budget, so it's really hard to direct you in a particular direction. So as a crapshoot I'd merely suggest a Summicron IV, although there are at least 15-20 other really good choices. I have traditionally kept 5-6 50mm variants on hand to accommodate my whims.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, poli said:

I do have a summicron iv which is a perfect lens. Still i am toying with the idea to get a Summarit 2.4, since I really like my summarit 35 as well. Crazy perhaps...

Yup. I have a Summicron ver 5 and have been satisfied for several years. Then picked up a used Summarit 35 2.5 (I like 39mm filters) and subsequently added a Summarit 50 2.5 - which has identical body and handling. They are now my main M10 lenses.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TomB_tx said:

Yup. I have a Summicron ver 5 and have been satisfied for several years. Then picked up a used Summarit 35 2.5 (I like 39mm filters) and subsequently added a Summarit 50 2.5 - which has identical body and handling. They are now my main M10 lenses.

Same Summarit-M bite but having disreputable number of nice lenses, I tried my first Summarit-M 2.5/50 cheap pre-owned with suspicion.

I loved the classic rendering a lot and the compact/light but solid feel when in use, I added the 2.5/35mm then 2.5/75mm when I found them second hand.

I changed my suspicion into enthusiasm for the Summarit-M lens line.

They are far from perfect but they do what I want them to do, as nice as other lenses but weighting much less and very compact to carry around.

 

Edited by a.noctilux
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, a.noctilux said:

Same Summarit-M bite but having disreputable number of nice lenses, I tried my first Summarit-M 2.5/50 cheap pre-owned with suspicion.

I loved the classic rendering a lot and the compact/light but solid feel when in use, I added the 2.5/35mm then 2.5/75mm when I found them second hand.

I changed my suspicion into enthusiasm for the Summarit-M lens line.

 

I was considering the Summarit before I posted but was concerned it might be an inferior lens to the f2; I too looked at it with suspicion. 

It's sounding really good though based on everyone's responses.

Thanks
Mike

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nachtmsk said:

I was considering the Summarit before I posted but was concerned it might be an inferior lens to the f2; I too looked at it with suspicion...

The modern range of Summarits are superb lenses. End of Story.

I have a version IV Summicron and love it to bits (the v4 and v5 Summicrons share the same optical construction and you can see above how many members like these lenses) but I suspect that the Summarit might be a 'better' all-round performer if you like a more 'modern' rendering and the loss of 1/2 stop isn't an issue. In fact I'm seriously considering picking one up myself...

P.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am big fan of 50mm. My first 50mm was 'cron and I thought it was best lens ever. Until 2009, my boss sold me the used 'Lux50. It had been the lens that I never took off my black M6 since it was mounted. I sold my Leica and moved to Sony A7 for 4 years. When I back to Leica again, my first lens is 'Lux 50. I use it 50% of my photo. That's the reason to get another body because I know I will always use 'Lux50 most of the time (and let another body to be lens changing body).

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, poli said:

I do have a summicron iv which is a perfect lens. Still i am toying with the idea to get a Summarit 2.4, since I really like my summarit 35 as well. Crazy perhaps...

Well it is a lot smaller. With a iv you can’t get it in the inside pocket of your jeans jacket, which will go with the Summarit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...