jaapv Posted January 27, 2020 Share #1 Posted January 27, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Post your early spring shots here. Today, the Geese started returning. In summer, we have tens of thousands in the nature reserve behind my house. In winter virtually none, they will have moved South. CL 55-135 @ 135. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 5 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/305781-winter-is-over-open-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3900414'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 27, 2020 Posted January 27, 2020 Hi jaapv, Take a look here Winter is over (open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
david strachan Posted January 27, 2020 Share #2 Posted January 27, 2020 Very nice...love the misty background. Beaut action in the geese. (maybe crop the buoy out of the image) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 27, 2020 Author Share #3 Posted January 27, 2020 Yes, I noticed just now 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted January 27, 2020 Share #4 Posted January 27, 2020 Hello David & Jaap, Why would you crop the buoy? It not only balances the geese on that side of the photo but it is also a part of what Jaap saw. It is a part of what is there. This is important for providing a realistic perspective for viewers in the future. Best Regards, Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 27, 2020 Author Share #5 Posted January 27, 2020 Sorry, Michael. It was removed as a disturbing element that spoilt the impression of the photograph. I can claim precedent: Gursky's Rhein II was heavily cloned, removing whole buildings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted January 27, 2020 Share #6 Posted January 27, 2020 1 hour ago, jaapv said: Sorry, Michael. It was removed as a disturbing element that spoilt the impression of the photograph. I can claim precedent: Gursky's Rhein II was heavily cloned, removing whole buildings. Hello Jaap, I know that the rewriting of History is often done to make what is presented either more pleasant or to have what is presented be seen as more in keeping with the World the way some people would prefer it to be. Altho for some other people the idea of photography is to record the World the way it actually is. Best Regards, Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 28, 2020 Author Share #7 Posted January 28, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Not to me. Because it cannot, even in unaltered state. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted January 28, 2020 Share #8 Posted January 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, jaapv said: Not to me. Because it cannot, even in unaltered state. Hello Jaap, Whether work of any type is done perfectly or not does not stop some people from trying to do things as well as or/& as accurately as possible. If People accepted a World of "cannot" then they might still be living in caves. Or they might still be standing outside in the rain discussing whether or not it is possible to go inside of a cave to get out of the rain. At certain times in the World some people have said that people "cannot" fly to the Moon. People "cannot" cure Polio. People "cannot" make an "M" camera into a digital camera because the back focus is too short. And so on. Best Regards, Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 28, 2020 Author Share #9 Posted January 28, 2020 Yes, but that is completely beside the point. The image must represent my vision, so I will alter it to my interpretation. The accuracy lies in matching my perception. In this case, a half-buoy on the edge has nothing to do with the scene, it was not iregistered in my consciousness, so it shouldn't be there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted January 28, 2020 Share #10 Posted January 28, 2020 15 hours ago, jaapv said: Yes, but that is completely beside the point. The image must represent my vision, so I will alter it to my interpretation. The accuracy lies in matching my perception. In this case, a half-buoy on the edge has nothing to do with the scene, it was not iregistered in my consciousness, so it shouldn't be there. Hello Jaap, That is 1 way at looking at things. But, it does NOT make what I have written beside the point. 5 people can sit in the same chair & look at the same apple & see very different things. And everyone benefits when each person shares their perspective. Best Regards, Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now