Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Mr.Q said:

So it's got Smart AF and Smart IBIS?

I hope it doesn't have Smart LENR as well.

Menu driven also. Choose it when appropriate.  They were confident enough with long exposure ISO noise to remove it. 
 

Leica were also confident that SL2 has better IQ and better high ISO than S1R. Even if I think that the difference is slight  .

It also has better video capabilities and quality than S1R. Actually Leica said that SL2 have the best video implementation of every mirrorless in the market. Except S1H. 
 

SL2 shoots 5K at 30 ; 25 ; 25 fps 

Edited by nicci78
Link to post
Share on other sites

12g lighter. Great achievement. 
 

I don’t really see any reason to upgrade unless they have significantly raised the video bit rate and made it actually usable with the flat profile without inducing an insane amount of noise like the SL. 
 

The rest seems rather basic evolution and one would hope for more after 4 years. Perhaps the autofocus is much improved but is it up to the Sony level of magic? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smart vs. Flexible AF.  

Leica SL2: Smart AF (autonomously selects AFs and AFc), AFs (picture taken only after successful focusing), AFc (picture can be taken at any time).

Lumix AFF: "Flexible" in the sense that it repeatedly checks to see if the subject is focus and if not, it attempts to refocus without assuming continuous movement - Think basketball. Again, you need to half-press the shutter button for focus to occur.

Sound like two different things to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its funny to watch. I am not a Leica user yet, but its the same in any Photograhy Forum in the Internet and with any Camera brand. When a company release a new camera everybody is crying how bad it is. This is Missing, AF is Bad Menu System is wrong and so on... and no one used the camera. :D

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 24 Minuten schrieb nicci78:

Just plain Panasonic DFD with object detection. No eye AF. 
 

47MP, IBIS, 10bit video, 5K, L-Log profile, new handgrip, new menu system. Are little more than just basic evolution. 

Really no revolution, at most a normal evolution. I am disappointed.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Rockcrusher said:

Its funny to watch. I am not a Leica user yet, but its the same in any Photograhy Forum in the Internet and with any Camera brand. When a company release a new camera everybody is crying how bad it is. This is Missing, AF is Bad Menu System is wrong and so on... and no one used the camera. :D

A certainty on this forum when some of the armchair camera /lens designers choose to poo poo new products they've likely not used and have no intention of buying … e.g. as happened with the XV 

dunk 

Edited by dkCambridgeshire
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rockcrusher said:

Its funny to watch. I am not a Leica user yet, but its the same in any Photograhy Forum in the Internet and with any Camera brand. When a company release a new camera everybody is crying how bad it is. This is Missing, AF is Bad Menu System is wrong and so on... and no one used the camera. :D

Actually hundreds of customers have tried the camera in the last months. Leica wanted to share it with its best customers first. 
Some people have educated opinions about. We are not spec sheets talking. 
 

SL2 is really nicer to handle. But losing the four buttons system puzzles me. Leica representatives refuse to talk about. Their answer it is easier to understand. Previous SL owner will have to adjust. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, nicci78 said:

 

SL2 is really nicer to handle. But losing the four buttons system puzzles me. Leica representatives refuse to talk about. Their answer it is easier to understand. Previous SL owner will have to adjust. 

Very bad design, no continuity. If you upgrade your camera you have to learn a new set of operations to control it, when it should be second nature.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, earleygallery said:

Very bad design, no continuity. If you upgrade your camera you have to learn a new set of operations to control it, when it should be second nature.

SL was developed in house by the professional business unit of Leica. 
SL2 is outsourced to an external Munich design studio.

That may explain the difference in the user interface choice. 

Edited by nicci78
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nicci78 said:

SL was developed in house by the professional business unit of Leica. 
SL2 is outsourced to an external Munich studio design.

That may explain the difference in the user interface choice. 

That's no excuse, they really should keep a common design for the 'user interface'. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...