Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi, all

A local camera store here in NYC is selling one of these used for $650 -- can anyone shed light on how it performs with a digital M? I know it was produced for film cameras. Or do you recommend just saving up for an Elmarit-m ASPH?

Thanks,

Anthony

Edited by Afairall
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M-Rokkor 28 mm 1:2.8 is a good lens—still, $650 US seems a bit steep to me. This lens often suffers from little white spots right behind the front element; clean copies are rare these days. If the copy in your local store happens to be clean then it might be worth it.

In any case, the older Elmarit-M 28 mm, the current Elmarit-M 28 mm Asph, and the Summicron-M 28 mm Asph are better lenses ... but—by a very small margin only. You'd have to compare directly and to look very carefully to see the difference. If the lens happens to be out of whack and needed an adjustment then you'd be out of luck. Leica Customer Care won't touch an M-Rokkor lens, and Minolta is out of the camera and lens business for 13 years now. You'd need to find an independent technician, or do the CLA job yourself.

Edited by 01af
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good lens indeed, nicely made, matches well Mandler lenses with less acutance hence less "clinical" feeling than Summicron 28/2 and Elmarit 28/2.8 asph. No red edge problems with my M8.2 and M240. Works fine on the digital CL as well. 2 problems though: 
- The lens does not bring up 28mm but 35mm framelines on both my M8.2 and M240. A solution (i did not try) might consist in mounting the flange of an M-Rokkor 90/4 if you can find one.
- The lens may develop white spots coming from moisture on the black coating of the rim. See http://tinyurl.com/9d6g8a7 and what Olaf said above. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For a little more money, I’d rather have a good copy of the non ASPH 28mm f2.8 Elmarit-M, the one just prior to the first ASPH model. Tamarkin has one right now, really clean with the caps and hood, for $925. Worth the price difference in my opinion.

The one at Tamarkin appears to not be, but they can be found already 6 bit coded.

Edited by Gregm61
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

These lenses are great bargain grabs and can be had for well less than $400 (with minimal spotting). They are tiny and lightweight. Hard not to keep one around. 

I agree with @lct, they bring up 35mm framelines on my Leica bodies, but beautiful, uncluttered 28mm framelines on the Minolta CLE. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdlaing said:

No they are not. They are just different.

... and significantly bulkier. The Rokkor is even smaller than the Elmarit 28/2.8 asph v1. It has also a superb bayonet vented hood and the bayonet of the lens is not chrome a la Zeiss or CV but black. As for performances, i have no experience with lenses referred by Ko.Fe above so all i can say is when i bought the Rokkor it was on par with the then Elmarit 28/2.8 as far as i recall. It is now outperformed by the Elmarit 28/2.8 asph though. Here on the Epson R-D1.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I own and really like this lens - small and sharp. I read somewhere that a magazine test rated this more highly than the contemporary Elmarit when it came out. Mine has no white spots and I'm hoping that it was one of those which was apparently taken back and fixed by Minolta, though there are stories of them developing late. As far as the frame lines are concerned, I wedge my selector to the 28mm position with a small, folded piece of paper.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2019 at 10:39 AM, Afairall said:

Thank you for all of your input -- I avoided the Rokkor at that price. I actually picked up a Summicron 28mm for only $2200 -- my plan is to test and it and possibly keep it, or flip it to buy a used Elmarit ASPH.

Sounds like a great price, enjoy. If you decide it isn't what you like, another option is the Ricoh 28/2.8 LTM. It supposedly is the same optical formula as in their GR film cameras, an excellent design. The one listed is pricey but they were made in limited quantities.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites


I have this lens, it is a small gem, though it has its quirks: just 35mm frameline, hence no coding possible. BUT: there is no fringing/purple corner effect of wideangles. Or only invisible on my M240. And on the MM1 it just gives some concentration because of some vignetting. So coding is not needed at all.

Great ‘soft’ sharpness and a superb unsharpness, and in that surpasses my ZM28. Ok, Scheideritis? Yes - it has milky edges against the light, just like many MF lenses made by that firm.

last year, agree maybe just like any 28mm, 

Recent in Delft and here the brilliance of the center makes this picture shine:

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This one would have been sharper with the Elmarit 28/2.8 asph perhaps but the latter did not exist yet. Shot in 2004 with the Rokkor 28/2.8 on my Epson R-D1.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 10/22/2019 at 3:39 AM, sinjun said:

I own and really like this lens - small and sharp. I read somewhere that a magazine test rated this more highly than the contemporary Elmarit when it came out. Mine has no white spots and I'm hoping that it was one of those which was apparently taken back and fixed by Minolta, though there are stories of them developing late. As far as the frame lines are concerned, I wedge my selector to the 28mm position with a small, folded piece of paper.

hi.  how exactly do you use the folded piece of paper to change the framelines?  on a digital leica?  I could imagine that on a film leica.  thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wmm said:

hi.  how exactly do you use the folded piece of paper to change the framelines?  on a digital leica?  I could imagine that on a film leica.  thanks

 

Some digital bodies (eg, M-E, M240) don't have a manual frameline selector. Most of the others do, on the front of the camera, just like the film ones.

A folded piece of paper - or cardboard or toothpick, or whatever - allows to temporarily lock the selector in the desired position and effectively "override" the lens mount to determine which framelines appear in the finder.

Edited by Ecar
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

An old thread but I just wanted to add how good this lens draws in my opinion. It’s one of my favourites on the m9p. I’m not a fan of asph lenses in general though.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by costa43
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The M-Rokkor 28/2.8 is a good lens on the M11 too. Good contrast and resolution below f/16 with less acutance than modern asph lenses as expected on a lens from the eighties. Blocks very little the VF and brings up 35mm frame lines but 28mm ones are hardly visible in the M11's VF anyway so framing with the whole VF is a good aproximation. The Rokkor is more prone to flare than modern 28mm lenses so better keep the sun or other bright light sources well outside the frame unless flare makes part of your photography. Snaps below at f/8. 


Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...