Switching from CL to SL2, anyone?

[Jainbaby]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

There is a gap Leica could totally fill with either:

A q minus the lens (full frame with EVF and ILC)

An M with EVF (sacrilege?)

I have a Q-P, love it, and will not upgrade. 

I would like to have a ILC and my choices (if I don't want rangefinder) from Leica are CL and SL...if there was something in the middle, how many of us would jump at it....forget about megapixels...just give us the size and features.

 

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[eev776]

On 9/15/2019 at 1:30 PM, DirkS said:

For me the CL was never a compromise. Instead of that the CL is the perfect combination of weight, size and top quality, if you choose the right lenses.  

I`m not a fan of the 18-56, but with Leica 11-23 (what a great lens!!), Pana 24-105, 1,4/35 and a good Tele (Leica or Pana 70-200 + 2x converter) I don`t see a real reason for buying a SL. The SL2 could be a option. But let`s wait for first reports and tests. If the pic quality is really better you`ll have to decide between light top quality and heavier even better quality.   

 

TL 11-23 is favorite lens on my CL, but I did sold my 55-135mm TL.