Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 9/9/2019 at 9:33 PM, lct said:

I could not do w/o one or two coupling rings in my small bags personally. Allows for mounting two lenses back to back and saves a lot of room this way. Been using mines since the eighties. I don't think they are being sold by Leica anymore but they were still available for R and M lenses in the nineties at least as they were listed in the manual of my L6J. Here's the M version, code 14838. Only con it has no center partition so mounting two protruding lenses is impossible or dangerous for the rear elements. 

I have a couple too. Another con is the lack of protection of the rear element of the "idle" lens. No breadcrumbs or sharp objects in the bag - not that we'd want to carry these alongside our precious lenses anyway... 

The Leica R version was a smarter design, with a center partition.

Edited by Ecar
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ecar said:

I have a couple too. Another con is the lack of protection of the rear element of the "idle" lens. No breadcrumbs or sharp objects in the bag - not that we'd want to carry these alongside our precious lenses anyway... 
The Leica R version was a smarter design, with a center partition.

Not a problem on R lenses due to their little protrusion or lack thereof. But many M lenses do protrude as you know and designing a center partition for them would not allow to couple for instance a 28 and a 90 as we can do with the 14838 coupling ring. A later one i don't recall the name has such a center partition and felt useless when i tried it for this reason. Perhaps the GoWing is deeper though i don't know. BTW a body cap (14397 or other) provides a good protection for the idle lens if needed. Of course those accessories are not weather sealed but neither are M lenses anyway.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lct said:

Not a problem on R lenses due to their little protrusion or lack thereof. But many M lenses do protrude as you know and designing a center partition for them would not allow to couple for instance a 28 and a 90 as we can do with the 14838 coupling ring. A later one i don't recall the name has such a center partition and felt useless when i tried it for this reason. Perhaps the GoWing is deeper though i don't know. BTW a body cap (14397 or other) provides a good protection for the idle lens if needed. Of course those accessories are not weather sealed but neither are M lenses anyway.

Fair enough. A matter of personal habits and preferences (and bag size...), I guess.

Could the later one you are referring to be the Op/Tech? Never tried it as it seems to be about as large as two standard rear caps - and looks like one of these cheap 3D-printed  gizmos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ecar said:

Could the later one you are referring to be the Op/Tech?

Yes it is the Op/Tech double lens mount cap for M lenses:
https://tinyurl.com/yyoa9f28

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, lct said:

Yes it is the Op/Tech double lens mount cap for M lenses:
https://tinyurl.com/yyoa9f28

LCT, that one looks to only have 3 flanges so wouldn't that one be for R lenses?

Pete.

Edited by farnz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...