Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have stopped looking for another 85 or 90 mm lens, as the pre-ASPH is a wonderful lens. Just another Mandler masterpiece.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not exactly a showcase for the 90 f/2, more like a landscape. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I'm thinking to let my 90mm F4 Elmar-C go and upgrade to a Summicron 90mm F2 (pre asph).
I was using it few days ago for some filming (sitting on a tripod, shooting from the distance) and I noticed the image being slightly soft when shooting wide open (i wasn't on infinity...but almost!).

How's the Summicron F2 compare? is it nicely sharp at all distances and wide open?

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, jonnyboy said:

I'm thinking to let my 90mm F4 Elmar-C go and upgrade to a Summicron 90mm F2 (pre asph). [...] How's the Summicron F2 compare? is it nicely sharp at all distances and wide open?

It is nicely unsharp ;) at f/2. Neither soft nor tack sharp, perfect for gentle portraits. For sharper results at f/2 you may wish to consider the Summicron 90/2 apo. 

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jonnyboy said:

As much as I would love to have a lens with character etc I will often use this lens for filming, hence I need sharpness at all apertures/distances.
Maybe the 90mm F2.5 could be a good option?

I have no experience with it but my Summarit 90/2.4 could do it certainly. It can be slightly soft on edges and corners below f/5.6 though. The Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 is more homogeneous in this respect. It has also a built-in hood but its MFD is 1m vs 0.9m for the 90/2.4. You can go wrong with neither lens anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 2/14/2023 at 2:36 PM, lct said:

I have no experience with it but my Summarit 90/2.4 could do it certainly. It can be slightly soft on edges and corners below f/5.6 though. The Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 is more homogeneous in this respect. It has also a built-in hood but its MFD is 1m vs 0.9m for the 90/2.4. You can go wrong with neither lens anyway.

Also consider the last Elmarit 90/2.8 - the one with the sliding hood. A very good all around performer in a small package. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, plaidshirts said:

Also consider the last Elmarit 90/2.8 - the one with the sliding hood. A very good all around performer in a small package. 

It is the Elmarit 90/2.8 v2 i was referring to above. Solid as a tank but small package i would not say so. Better choose an Apo-Skopar 90/2.8 for that. Very good lens, the same size as the "fat" Tele-Elmarit 90/2.8 more or less with a handy bayonet hood that can be reversed for transportation. Sharper than the T-E at f/2.8 with less flare than the latter. It has not significantly less color fringing though in spite of its apo capabilities. FWIW.

Edited by lct
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have this lens, and the 90/2.8 "thin" TEM. I tend to use the TEM more because of it's size, but I shot these portraits of my wife the other day with the 90/2.0 pre ASPH and I'm very please. My daughter asked for some professional head shots and I tried both this and the 75/1.4. For whatever reason I preferred the 90/2.0 in this situation.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Have a good day time to everybody.
Guys, may be you have some information that would be helpfull for me. I have the next situation:
the seller offer to me this lens, 1998 year. Very good condition, leather case, caps. But has one nuance - a Leica seal on the one bayonet screw.
What does it mean? It was repaired or what? May be claened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be to blacken the screw head you can see below as the coding pits are black there.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...