Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This image straight from the M10 except the crop. Lens was at .95 but data says f4. Same with all the other images as the data never seems to agree with what the lens says. I use Photos on a Mac so no Lightroom, etc. Anyone else had this issue with incorrect aperture data? Thanks

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
4 minutes ago, Archer911 said:

This image straight from the M10 except the crop. Lens was at .95 but data says f4. Same with all the other images as the data never seems to agree with what the lens says. I use Photos on a Mac so no Lightroom, etc. Anyone else had this issue with incorrect aperture data? Thanks

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Yes, the Photos information is frequently not accurate as to the aperture. Rob

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Lonely Brunch 💄
📸Leica M246 Monochrom Noctilux-m 50mm f1.2 AA
#milanswolfsphotography

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

We moved house back in October, and unpacking boxes has taken longer than we anticipate - library still in boxes waiting for the joiner to instal shelving.

One thing I had unpacked and sorted was the wine cellar - and I found this (with a whole fillet of beef, roasted):

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

And we finished with this (with a deconstructed cherry cheese cake, served in champagne glasses) - something I had been holding for almost 30 years!  It was sublime!

All wide open, ISO 320(1/4000), 500 (1/90) & 640 (1/60) respectively (as the evening wore on), M9 Monochrom

Edited by IkarusJohn
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Milan_S said:

 

Thank you both! 

I truly mean this as I too own an original f1.2 Noctilux and I find this lens can have a mind of its own to be able to capture the image as beautifully as you did, and you really did show us all that when the 1.2 Noct is on its game it is a wonderful and magical lens. I find though it is not always this good and for the most part I shoot with my F1 Noctilux or the new 75 1.25 Noctilux.

Thank you again for sharing such a stunning photograph. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2020 at 3:59 PM, IkarusJohn said:

We moved house back in October, and unpacking boxes has taken longer than we anticipate - library still in boxes waiting for the joiner to instal shelving.

One thing I had unpacked and sorted was the wine cellar - and I found this (with a whole fillet of beef, roasted):

And we finished with this (with a deconstructed cherry cheese cake, served in champagne glasses) - something I had been holding for almost 30 years!  It was sublime!

All wide open, ISO 320(1/4000), 500 (1/90) & 640 (1/60) respectively (as the evening wore on), M9 Monochrom

First question, why were we all not invited to share in such beautiful wines, and second which Noctilux did you shoot these with? 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2020 at 5:53 PM, Archer911 said:

This image straight from the M10 except the crop. Lens was at .95 but data says f4. Same with all the other images as the data never seems to agree with what the lens says. I use Photos on a Mac so no Lightroom, etc. Anyone else had this issue with incorrect aperture data? Thanks

It estimates the f-stop from the amount of light that passes through the lens. If you shot with a 3 or 4 stop ND filter it would explain the reported f4.

As an aside, the mis-estimated f-stop probably means that lens corrections applied by the camera will be weaker (assuming a coded lens). For example, if you shoot wide-open with an ND filter there will probably be more vignetting left in the raw file than if shooting wide open without the filter.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mark II said:

It estimates the f-stop from the amount of light that passes through the lens. If you shot with a 3 or 4 stop ND filter it would explain the reported f4.

As an aside, the mis-estimated f-stop probably means that lens corrections applied by the camera will be weaker (assuming a coded lens). For example, if you shoot wide-open with an ND filter there will probably be more vignetting left in the raw file than if shooting wide open without the filter.

I understand where you're coming from but it's very unlikely because the vignetting correction is applied to wide angle lenses to adjust for the offset pixels at the edge of the sensor, which compensate for the rays that hit towards the sensor's edge at an oblique angle owing to the (short) Leica M lens register of 27.8 mm.  

On the other hand, the Noctilux's characteristic vignetting is caused by rays at the lens's edge being diffracted and attenuated by a larger amount, which appears as vignetting.

Pete.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2020 at 6:09 AM, evikne said:

Photobomb 😄 M10 with 50mm Noctilux f/1

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

@evikne these photographs of your beautiful (daughter?) are an outstanding collection of portraits that you will have now forever. Time goes by quickly and in the blink of an eye they are all grown up and gone. The shots (imho) are a also a beautiful reminder of just how useful a lens can be in drawing attention to subject matter the you want attention focused on - painterly use of light..thank you for sharing.

@farnz the railway series was beyond excellent and firmly in the realms of cinematographic - wonderful - thanks for sharing Pete.

I recently sold my 0.95 - the third time I have sold a Noctilux over 20 years and I regret it (again) - so I will buy one back as soon as a copy becomes available. It is a unique lens - far from perfect in many ways, frustrating to use wide open in daylight because of the ND requirement but worth the hassle if one has use for its unique drawing capability.  

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, farnz said:

I understand where you're coming from but it's very unlikely because the vignetting correction is applied to wide angle lenses to adjust for the offset pixels at the edge of the sensor, which compensate for the rays that hit towards the sensor's edge at an oblique angle owing to the (short) Leica M lens register of 27.8 mm. 

It would be interesting to test if there is any correction applied for the 50mm Noctilux lenses. I have tried this before with a 262 and 50mm Summilux, and there appeared to be a small vignetting  correction being made. Maybe it was from the raw processing an not in-camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark II said:

It would be interesting to test if there is any correction applied for the 50mm Noctilux lenses. I have tried this before with a 262 and 50mm Summilux, and there appeared to be a small vignetting  correction being made. Maybe it was from the raw processing an not in-camera?

Personally I have not noticed a difference in vignetting in wide open 50/1 Noctilux pictures whether the lens was selected in the camera's menu or not.

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Red Tulip

M-P w/Noctilux-M 1.0.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2020 at 4:36 PM, Mark II said:

It estimates the f-stop from the amount of light that passes through the lens. If you shot with a 3 or 4 stop ND filter it would explain the reported f4.

As an aside, the mis-estimated f-stop probably means that lens corrections applied by the camera will be weaker (assuming a coded lens). For example, if you shoot wide-open with an ND filter there will probably be more vignetting left in the raw file than if shooting wide open without the filter.

No ND filter but a circular polarizer, the B+W XS-Pro Digital. Do you think this could cause a misread? I will test without the filter to verify.

Thanks Mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Leica M9, Noctilux M/f0.95, ND filter ?, f 0.95, June 2013

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...