Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is the algorithm.. I once had a photo in there  for a month with only 7 likes; I thought it a pretty good shot, mind you ;) and another one with 24 never made it in the same period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jaapv said:

It is the algorithm.. I once had a photo in there  for a month with only 7 likes; I thought it a pretty good shot, mind you ;) and another one with 24 never made it in the same period.

So, the algorithm needs to be changed. Though it's not a matter of earth-shaking importance, if you're going to have a page of favourite images, it ought to mean something.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, robgo2 said:

So, the algorithm needs to be changed. Though it's not a matter of earth-shaking importance, if you're going to have a page of favourite images, it ought to mean something.

The problem is not trivial. One way to criticism is for the site owner-operator to disclose the method. I certainly do not mean that as a challenge, but a call for our experienced participants to contribute.

 

Edited by pico
Link to post
Share on other sites

The system is throwing up so many anomalies that it is failing to identify favourite images. In reality, it is presenting a random selection of images. Nothing wrong with showcasing a random selection of images but they shouldn’t be described as favourite when they are no such thing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Yet another problem, as noted here before, are threads with a fixed claque, which throw up so many thanks that they tend to drown out the rest of the forum. I'm really sure that Andreas has done his best to make the system as fair as possible, but he is limited by the software.

I agree about the label of "favourite". It introduces an element of competition, which should not be there. It is about showcasing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jaapv said:

Yet another problem, as noted here before, are threads with a fixed claque, which throw up so many thanks that they tend to drown out the rest of the forum. I'm really sure that Andreas has done his best to make the system as fair as possible, but he is limited by the software.

I agree about the label of "favourite". It introduces an element of competition, which should not be there. It is about showcasing.

Yes, showcasing the best work as measured by the number of "likes" received over a given period of time. That does not seem like it should be a difficult problem to solve, but perhaps the software will not allow it. If that is the case, I suggest discussing the matter with the software developers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Another thing about the favorites page: A high percentage of the photos are of pretty women. If that's what people like, then so be it, but it does tend to skew the results away from other photos that may be of higher quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Apologies for dragging the shortcomings of the Favourites gallery up again but I see a whimsical flow chart, (post #203) that's presumably not the poster's own work, included in the top gallery.  It's not a photograph, therefore it's not taken with Leica equipment* and has no business being there.  I think the algorithms that are being used really need sorting out.

*Apart from the 'I like film thread'.  (I have felt for some time that the 'cost' of the 'I like film thread' thread being allowed to include pictures taken with any brand gear should be exclusion from the favourites page.  After all, this is the Leica forum and the favourites page is regularly swamped by pictures from non-Leica equipment.)

Pete.

Edited by farnz
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...