More Greetings from Oregon & two (2) Questions

[rocky]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello.  My name is Rocky and have been reading this forum on and off for quite a while.  My photography journey started when I was a teenager living in Tokyo in the mid-60's shooting, developing, and printing black and white.  I wish I had bought a Canon f/0.95 lens then selling new for about $140.  Fast forward to the early 2000's when I overcame the idea that this hobby was too expensive.  Not exactly true, so I compared Nikon and Canon, and really liked the image quality of Nikon, but chose Canon for its inventory of "L" glass -- especially fast lenses. I'm fortunate to have a good copy of the 50mm f/1.0L -- not  in the same league as a Noctilux, but for about 1/3 the cost.  I had never even touched a Leica camera till last week-end when I spent about 45 minutes with a Leica M10 and W-O-W!  To borrow a line from the film "Field of Dreams", "Is this heaven?" Yesterday I looked at an M6 and the body seemed to melt into my hands.  In the Canon world the 300mm f/2.8L IS is considered by many to be the holy grail for its sharpness, bokeh and rendering of colors.  It's also a beast of a lens to handhold which is often how I prefer to shoot it order to be more versatile and nimble.  In the next week or so I expect to have a Monochrom M 1st generation which I'm getting from a guy off of Fred Miranda, and the shutter has less than 2000 actuations.  I was going to wait for the M10 Monochrom, but can't pass up such an opportunity.  There will be an M10-P coming in soon and several lenses including a Nocti --- but there are limits to what I can buy.  A local photo shop does rent a Zeiss 20mm Canon mount, so I'm wondering if anyone here has used an adaptor as the one made by Fotodiox with good results on a Leica M body, and if so, did you use live view to focus and please share your experience. A British chap who used to work at the Photo Shop I mentioned was the local Leica guy, and he once told me of how he used a Nikon D800 equipped with a macro lens to "scan" 35 mm negatives that he would then convert to digital form with a scanner and then process in Photoshop, so question #2 is has anyone done something similar here, did you use a flatbed or barrel scanner and how do you think  the results compared to doing that work by conventional means. 

Edited March 16, 2019 by rocky
typo