Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 minutes ago, insideline said:

Grahamc: What a truly stunning (!) photograph, thank you for sharing it with all of us. If it were mine (wish it was) I would enlarge it into a very big print as it deserves to be on a primary wall taking up a good part of that wall. Simply beautiful. 

PS. I own the same lens as you, late German in titanium finish and adore it. 

Thanks so much :)  I’m really happy with this one and yes I think I might so that thanks for the suggestion and for the kind feedback. I think the tri-x worked really nice on this I really like the blacks. Cheers again !

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
14 minutes ago, insideline said:

 

PS. I own the same lens as you, late German in titanium finish and adore it. 

Also glad to hear about the Titan. I love mine too. The only other non-aluminium lens I have is a 50 cron, but the heavier weight of that longer lens doesn’t work as well as on this smaller lens (IMO)... 

it really is incredible build despite have my focus tab snapping away for some unknown reason (I treat them carefully so must’ve been a freak incident) 

Edited by grahamc
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grahamc said:

Thanks so much :)  I’m really happy with this one and yes I think I might so that thanks for the suggestion and for the kind feedback. I think the tri-x worked really nice on this I really like the blacks. Cheers again !

It is pictures like yours especially that has me thinking seriously about dusting off my M6 and shooting film again as a compliment to my primary M10M, as this new very capable digital camera falls short at times to meter evenly during the mid day plus the gentle grain and overall tonality from the Tri-X can't be duplicated with the M10M, at least I am not able to. Love to hear how the print turns out. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grahamc said:

Also glad to hear about the Titan. I love mine too. The only other non-aluminium lens I have is a 50 cron, but the heavier weight of that longer lens doesn’t work as well as on this smaller lens (IMO)... 

it really is incredible build despite have my focus tab snapping away for some unknown reason (I treat them carefully so must’ve been a freak incident) 

Yes the all brass construction of these late German titanium finish lenses makes for an incredibly solid and well made lens. I also feel the focus feel and aperture clicks are superior to the standard black alloy bodied copies. Regarding your focus tab coming off I recently viewed another Ti 35 1.4 pre-asph for sale on EBAY I believe that had its focus tab poorly glued back on. My copy was a brand new old stock never opened copy yet when I took it out of its plastic bag some of the painted lettering was falling off into the bag. My thought is the Titanium finish is a bit slippery hence your focus tab and the painted letter adherence. Regardless of these small issues these lens are so well made and render in such a unique manner that these little challenges are trivial. Thanks for sharing your experiences and again for that wonderful picture. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, insideline said:

It is pictures like yours especially that has me thinking seriously about dusting off my M6 and shooting film again 

I’d highly recommend it.  I agree it’s impossible to capture the same energy in digital ... there’s just something about tri x that draws you in isn’t there.  I’m no expert as I only stated shooting film in March (other than film “photography” vacation point and shoots as a kid) but the images are very special IMO. I am sure you will love letting loose again on film. 
 

not to veer too far off topic but regarding tri-x, I seem to get consistently technically ‘better’ photos from other film stocks (specifically HP5) but there’s just something about the gritty imagery of tri-x that I just far prefer even when I take a technically poorer image. I don’t know, it’s kinda hard to describe but there is some magic in that stock I love it. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grahamc said:

I’d highly recommend it.  I agree it’s impossible to capture the same energy in digital ... there’s just something about tri x that draws you in isn’t there.  I’m no expert as I only stated shooting film in March (other than film “photography” vacation point and shoots as a kid) but the images are very special IMO. I am sure you will love letting loose again on film. 
 

not to veer too far off topic but regarding tri-x, I seem to get consistently technically ‘better’ photos from other film stocks (specifically HP5) but there’s just something about the gritty imagery of tri-x that I just far prefer even when I take a technically poorer image. I don’t know, it’s kinda hard to describe but there is some magic in that stock I love it. 

Oh absolutely on the comparisons between Kodak Tri-X and finer-cleaner rendering black and white stock film from Fuji, Illford and others. Tri-X is in fact a bit gritty and the contrast between shades differentiates it from the finer films and I agree makes for more dramatic photographs. I shot a great deal with my LHSA M6 but I have far more 120 medium format contact sheets, negatives, photos and enlargements on our walls from my Hasselblad 503 shot with Kodak Tri-X, exceeding 225,000 negatives in total all in B&W. I bowed out of film about 6 years ago as some of my favorite developer chemicals were discontinued and then the cost of sending out for processing along with the endless hours of scanning took its toll, but, every time I look back on my own film work and the lovely photographs you and others post here I am almost certain I will buy some new film stock and test my patience again. Thanks for the push.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 minutes ago, insideline said:

Oh absolutely on the comparisons between Kodak Tri-X and finer-cleaner rendering black and white stock film from Fuji, Illford and others. Tri-X is in fact a bit gritty and the contrast between shades differentiates it from the finer films and I agree makes for more dramatic photographs. I shot a great deal with my LHSA M6 but I have far more 120 medium format contact sheets, negatives, photos and enlargements on our walls from my Hasselblad 503 shot with Kodak Tri-X, exceeding 225,000 negatives in total all in B&W. I bowed out of film about 6 years ago as some of my favorite developer chemicals were discontinued and then the cost of sending out for processing along with the endless hours of scanning took its toll, but, every time I look back on my own film work and the lovely photographs you and others post here I am almost certain I will buy some new film stock and test my patience again. Thanks for the push.

Wow. Must be amazing. Ok wonderful, I look forward to seeing the results of the titan + M6 here (nudge nudge ) :) 

thanks for sharing that. I think I’ll wander into the world of medium format with a hasi before long I’m sure 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

V2 35mm pre-asph Summilux 313xxxx / Tri-X / M-A

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 12
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Los Angeles in fog.   M4.  Trix. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I must confess, though I have and generally like this lens, I’m trying to convince myself that the famed “Leica glow” is not just nasty counter-veiling flair.  I’m coming to the conclusion that Leica glow warrants as much credibility as the “King of Bokeh”.

We have a multitude of choices, ranging from soft to flare prone.  I have a few “character” lenses, and I’d have to say that each new version of any lens is better than the previous version.  When I think of the fabulous images I love taken by great photographers, not one is great because of a flaw in the lens.  They are great in spite of the equipment used, rather than because of it.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Steven said:

I was lucky to be able to acquire three extra steel rims this week. One at market price, two of them at a 25% discount of the market value. 

First, I hate everyone that contributed to this thread as I currently want one steel rim.

Second, what is current "market price" for one of these?

Third, if you're still in Dubai you can sell me one of yours. ;) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things I find interesting about the internet is the sharing of knowledge and experience.  I do like my 35 Summilux pre-asph, but as I’ve said on a number of occasions, I find it a tricky beast.  I don’t get all breathless over “Leica glow”, character and the other nonsense which you read about elsewhere.

As for @Steven, I find no point in personal exchanges, and what anyone else thinks of me on the internet is of supreme indifference, primarily because sticking to the topic is more interesting.  If I disagree with what someone says (or someone disagrees with what I may say), attacking the person because you don’t like the message adds nothing but noise …

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Artin said:

Its just nuts .. 20K for black paint.. this I just don't get ? well I have never been a collector of anything in my life just can't justify paying that kind of money for a useless difference like black paint 

Arthur,

There’s photography, and collection - sometimes they overlap, sometimes they don’t.  I applaud anyone who buys something they like - for example this “steel rim”, which seems to be a 35 Summilux pre-asph with a steel front rim (I’d never heard of it before, to be honest) - and then they use it.

Collecting is another itch I don’t have either - not to be confused with buying more gear than you actually need, which I am guilty of.

John

PS - we cross posted.  I’m in the happy majority who look at a photo and don’t think “wow, that must have been taken with a steel rim”.  But, I know I have taken pictures with a camera or a lens I like, and it gives me pleasure.  Mostly, I haven’t seen a photo taken with an old lens that wouldn’t have been better taken with a more modern one, or with a Canon, Nikon or whatever - not to say these old lens photos aren’t good; just the lens has played a subsidiary role to the skill of the photographer.

That said, @JeffoJeffo’s photos with weird and wonderful lenses in the old glass thread are very interesting.

Edited by IkarusJohn
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...