Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It is well known that prime lenses have lots of benefits compared to zoom lenses because of a simpler construction. Among other things the developers don’t have to take into account that it should perform well on all focal lengths. 

 

Maybe a lens without an aperture could have similar benefits, because it can be fine tuned to perform on one aperture only?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe a lens without an aperture could have similar benefits, because it can be fine tuned to perform on one aperture only?

 

I think that the Summiluxes and Noctiluxes do perform as well as possible wide open. I don't see the lack of an aperture diaphragm changing performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that's pretty certain is that if Leica did make a "special" edition Noctilux with no aperture blades, then in line with their pricing habits, it is going to cost more than the normal ones. Less is more indeed  :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a 21mm Summilux stuck on 1.4, brand new.   With nothing to lose I used my jar opener and freed up the ring, it's always worked perfectly since.  

 

I think the OP has a very valid point about maximizing performance without the need to correct for use of center glass only.  Iirc astronomers use a aperture disk external to the optics for improved imaging.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Iirc astronomers use a aperture disk external to the optics for improved imaging.  

 

Nikon did the same for one of their 300mm lenses- the diaphragm was in the air behind the rearmost element.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tape or glue will do the trick. I recommend tape, then you’ll be able to restore it, when you get to your senses again. I’m sorry, I find the idea of having no aperture blades down right silly. What will be the next purist idea? A lens without focus ring? Only to be used at a fixed distance? Cameras with only one shutter speed? Lenses that always are artistic out of focus? Oh I forgot the Thambar!

 

Photography is all about light. The way you controle it, using the camera and the different settings, gives you many possibilities.

You could take a dream like picture without having a thambar, using soft light or shooting against the light etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actuly have a Noctilux without apature blades. In fact mine is even more special in that it does not have glass elements, or a focusing ring, or a body. I call it "Harvey"...

 

 

I've attached a photo of it.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I’ve said many times (many, many times) I make a picture when what I see makes me say “wow” (or, if I’m inexplicably upside down, “mom”) but there are times when I say “wow” (or, well, you get the idea) and I don’t make a picture. There are several reasons for this - wrong equipment, laziness, lack of time, ... but also overawedness. So I have empathy with Harvey. The best photographs I never took hang in the gallery known as Exo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....

Maybe a lens without an aperture could have similar benefits, because it can be fine tuned to perform on one aperture only?

 

A lens without an aperture is a bit like Leica's M-A camera, which corresponds to the MP except for the lack of the inbuilt lightmeter. I'd rather buy an MP and not use the lightmeter (I don't even have to put a battery in if I don't want to) than buy an M-A, but of course opinions on that may vary. Likewise, I can always fully open the aperture of any of my lenses, thus in effect making them "aperture-less", but if needed I may still stop down. I see absolutely no benefits at all in skipping the aperture, as Leica designs their current range of lenses to perform as good as possible at full aperture anyway.

 

Cheers, Andy

Edited by wizard
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I’ve said many times (many, many times) I make a picture when what I see makes me say “wow” (or, if I’m inexplicably upside down, “mom”) but there are times when I say “wow” (or, well, you get the idea) and I don’t make a picture. There are several reasons for this - wrong equipment, laziness, lack of time, ... but also overawedness. So I have empathy with Harvey. The best photographs I never took hang in the gallery known as Exo.

I have been experimenting of late. Your point, "wow," has always been something that fascinates me. The experiment has more to do with whether or not my immediate reaction, i.e. desire to compose, is exactly addressing the thing in my brain that brought on the response. I mean, there is definitely something there that stopped me in my tracks, but is it exactly what my immediate response leads me to act on? Several months ago I began to notice that, once i had taken the intended photo, if I stopped to look around a bit, I would often find an even better photograph.......sometimes from a completely different angle of view. Fascinating hobby.

Edited by Wayne
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...