Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hey!

 

Price aside - aren't the new SL 75mm and SL 90mm a great portrait lenses TL/CL owners hoped for? Is there any disadvantage of them being for SL except price and size? Do you think quality and AF performance will match TL/CL lenses? I think it should.

 

Also, for SL owners there's a huge advantage - well, it's an SL lens :) So i.e. owning SL50 and SL90 would give you four high performance high quality choices: 50mm, 75mm (50 mounted on TL/CL), 90mm and 135mm (90 mounted on TL/CL) FOV. What do you think about that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree completely.

 

The 50 1.4 on the CL is superb! (I had wondered about also acquiring the SL 75 but really find no need to, particularly as I also have the 24-90 and a R 80 1.4). I think I would opt for the 50 1.4 in lieu of one of the TL lenses were I intending on a portrait and had it as an option.

 

I really do not mind the size either.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by ropo54
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...