Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think, question like this are often comes from those, who came to M from systems with zooms. Including mobile phone users. :)

 

You could be right.  However, those coming from camera systems having used zooms can easily find out which focal lengths they use most often by checking the exif data of their files (assuming they are using digital).  It's not rocket surgery.  

I sort of get why there are so many threads about differences between <insert focal length here> lenses, given that Leica lenses range in price from expensive to eye-watering and there is a risk of making an expensive mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could be right.  However, those coming from camera systems having used zooms can easily find out which focal lengths they use most often by checking the exif data of their files (assuming they are using digital).  It's not rocket surgery.  

I sort of get why there are so many threads about differences between <insert focal length here> lenses, given that Leica lenses range in price from expensive to eye-watering and there is a risk of making an expensive mistake.

Not that easy if you are in a habit of cropping or stitching (I do both).

 

The following two crops are from the same stitched photo using 28mm. This is why I like 28mm.

 

Wider than 28mm (21mm?)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

narrower than 50mm (60mm?)

Edited by jmahto
  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is by the end of the threads, between us we will have suggested just about every option possible so I'm not sure how it helps anyone make their own decisions.

I agree when people respond only with a number, but when a reason is included I find them very valuable. It's nice to know how and why othe people approach the same subject.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's nice to know how and why othe people approach the same subject.

 

It can be but 'best' is very overused and all too often ill defined. It would be really useful if there was some form of guidance to posters which says that if you want to know what is a 'best' solution please specify under what circumstances. There is rarely a generic 'best' and too many threads seem to look for one.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I guess humility isn’t one of your strong points.

Ever wondered what might happen if you just offered a bit of free advice, you know, for goodness sake...

 

What's with the best focal length stuff?

 

Who asks that? A total new-comer who knows nothing about the median from which to judge - a 50mm, or a totally disoriented consumer wishing to dive into photography wishing there were an advantaged focal length?

 

Let 'em work it their own.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see @pico's reasoning and don't have a problem with it. A couple of people do. A forum is an open place for ideas. There are moderators if anything is unacceptable. Pico has neither been unacceptable nor unreasonable. He basically asked a question. How acceptable is it to consider that lacking humility?

 

Can't anyone ask a question (an adult to adult transaction) without being humiliated themselves?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

What's with the best focal length stuff?

 

Who asks that? A total new-comer who knows nothing about the median from which to judge - a 50mm, or a totally disoriented consumer wishing to dive into photography wishing there were an advantaged focal length?

 

Let 'em work it their own.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a complicated matter.

 

If the thread is of no interest, simply bypass it. No need to comment. No need to be dismissive or disparaging of someone's inquiry. Let those who choose to engage in the dialogue do so.

 

"Total new comers" and "disoriented consumers"  . . . why should they not be allowed to engage? (After all, was not everyone on this forum 'one of those' at some point?)

Edited by ropo54
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you measure 35mm film (or a full-frame sensor) from corner to corner, you wind up with about 43mm. A 43mm lens, right between 35 and 50, would give you the most natural possible perspective. If you've ever shot through a roughly 1x finder on a 43 or 42mm effective focal length lens, it can be quite a startling experience. Either you find it really liberating and natural, or you find it incredibly underwhelming that the camera isn't really 'doing much' with what you're looking at, at least in terms of perspective.

 

Hence, neither 35 or 50 is quite 'there' and since we all know there's no accounting for taste, it's a perfect situation for producing disagreement.

Edited by Lonescapes
Link to post
Share on other sites

I, for one, do find the M-Rokkor 40mm F2 to be an absolute favorite for more than its small size. It has given me many wonderful shots as my daily carry. I’ve become used to how it frames outside the 50mm lines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Free speech is the most valuable asset in hominid society.

 

Sure, one can speak freely.

 

I simply question the necessity to do so for the purpose of rhetorically denigrating another.  

 

Why does one need to get on the soapbox for that?

Edited by ropo54
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I suppose you are correct;  the grumpy old man needs to 'get a life'.  ;)  

 

Leave the poster alone to ask his questions and seek his knowledge, I say.

 

A grumpy old man gets irritated by a question.

A questioner gets offended by having his post denigrated.

It's kinda balanced.

There are worse hells.

Edited by ropo54
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...