Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

That is a little bit dummies like question but I am thinking about that two days and still not sure. I have both: NOCTILUX-M 1:0,95/50mm ASPH and SUMMICRON-M 1:2/50. Some differences are obvious e.g. speed. But which one in your opinion is better choice considering travel to a city with plans on street photography? Beside 50mm I going to take my SUMMILUX-M 1:1,4/28 mm ASPH.

 

Cheers,

Tomek

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take my Summilux-M 50mm or maybe Summarit-M 50 (my prefered now) if I need some compact/light 50mm.

Noctilux 50 is heavy and block 1/4 of the VF.

 

Summicron may be your choice, to pair with Lux 28mm but you are the only one to answer.

 

Which M do you use ?

 

With Visoflex 020 on M10, I'd take Noctilux for very low light (depend of where ...) and it would be the only one :p .

M10 at 50 kISO + Noctilux = everywhere nake eye can't see with OVF !

Edited by a.noctilux
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a little bit dummies like question but I am thinking about that two days and still not sure. I have both: NOCTILUX-M 1:0,95/50mm ASPH and SUMMICRON-M 1:2/50. Some differences are obvious e.g. speed. But which one in your opinion is better choice considering travel to a city with plans on street photography? Beside 50mm I going to take my SUMMILUX-M 1:1,4/28 mm ASPH.

 

Cheers,

Tomek

 

A Noctilux is pointless for street photography so I guess take your 50mm summicron

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, I think, deserves two piece of advice.

 

Rather than asking either or lens question real unasked question is which camera bag?

 

If you still struggle with dilemma between two lenses with different max F speed try to figure out which maximum f stop is sufficient to achieve your photographic objectives.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

A Noctilux is pointless for street photography so I guess take your 50mm summicron

 

"Pointless" is a bit strong. With experience and perhaps an EVF, it has its place for a particular effect. See Messr. von Overgard's lovely work with it.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

"Pointless" is a bit strong. With experience and perhaps an EVF, it has its place for a particular effect. See Messr. von Overgard's lovely work with it.

Why EVF? Because of it’s size and influence on possibility to view full frame? Thorsten is rather against it. I saw his noctilux pictures and they are great. But fist 20 my shots show that this isn’t easy lens. But portraits it is doing beautiful
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why EVF? Because of it’s size and influence on possibility to view full frame? Thorsten is rather against it. I saw his noctilux pictures and they are great. But fist 20 my shots show that this isn’t easy lens. But portraits it is doing beautiful

Watch some videos of him and he’s got the EVF on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

"Pointless" is a bit strong. With experience and perhaps an EVF, it has its place for a particular effect. See Messr. von Overgard's lovely work with it.

 

 

 

f/0.95 may have a place but 'street photography' isn't it. You're never going to focus that critically fast enough to make use of the apeture for street photography. OK so maybe if you taken hundreds of crappy frames one might turn out OK but that kind of 'spray and pray' approach is amateur at best.

 

To be honest, I've still not figured out what place f/0.95 has anywhere let alone in street photography. About the best conclusion I can reach of the Noctilux is if you're more interested in the out of focus areas of a frame than the in focus ones. It's an odd aesthetic to my mind; it's a saccharine coated cliche that for some reason seems so beloved of Leica shooters (of which I am one). Almost without exception whenever I shoot my 50mm Summilux wide open, I wish I'd stopped down more and so now, I never shoot below f/2 and rarely below f/2.8 and this is for portraiture.

 

Regarding Thorsten Overgard, yes I am familiar with him. He seems like a nice guy and his videos are relaxing in an odd kind of way but I don't rate his work even remotely. It's not bad per se, it's just not that interesting and I certainly don't think he's any more talented than most of the average people I follow on Instagram.

 

 

What happens when it gets dark...? You shoot w/nocti..or get an A7s...

 

You put your camera away and drink wine and discuss important and interesting things like metaphysics, psychology, politics, economics etc. Photography is 'painting with light'; it's kind of hard to do that when it's dark.

Edited by geetee1972
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

That is a little bit dummies like question but I am thinking about that two days and still not sure. I have both: NOCTILUX-M 1:0,95/50mm ASPH and SUMMICRON-M 1:2/50. Some differences are obvious e.g. speed. But which one in your opinion is better choice considering travel to a city with plans on street photography? Beside 50mm I going to take my SUMMILUX-M 1:1,4/28 mm ASPH.

Cheers,
Tomek

Hi Tomek!

We have a very similar approach having a minimalistic combo on travel. If I really need to travel very restrictive I'd have the Lux 28 and a 50 with me. 

In most cases I prefer the Nocti 50. The reason is the variety of options. With this combo I have the wide angle, the 50 and in addition to that an amazing lens for all light conditions and many portrait opportunities. 

Not everyone might like this for street photography but I do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a few examples which I wouldn't have done that way without my Noctilux. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would opt for the cron in regards street photography in particular for several reasons:

 

1. the noct is big and attracts more attention, the cron is diminutive.

2. the notional advantage of the cron, namely a fourfold light gathering ability is obviated by the fact that you are doing street photography. Even if you were doing night street photography, a higher ISO readily compensates.

3. the minuscule DOF at f/0.95 makes street photography a challenge.

4. the noct is heavy.

5. the noct is not very versatile.

 

I suspect you catch my drift...

 

Albert  ;)  ;)  :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...