DS1969 Posted November 24, 2017 Share #21 Posted November 24, 2017 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) But what is the advantage of a fixed lens as long as the combo body+interchangable lens isnt any bigger? The advantage is simplicity. Point, frame, focus and take. Oh and portability, without a bag full of lenses. I used to carry a backpack, I now carry a Billigham Hadley small, with only the X and the Sofort in it. And when I walk, the Billingham insert goes in my backpack with just the X in it. Lightweight and compact. room for my other gear without weighing in too heavy. Edited November 24, 2017 by DS1969 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Hi DS1969, Take a look here What is the future of the X line?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
NZDavid Posted November 29, 2017 Share #22 Posted November 29, 2017 Another advantage is dust resistance. In this respect the X-U looks unbeatable. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS1969 Posted November 29, 2017 Share #23 Posted November 29, 2017 There is a chap who is linked to a Leica dealer sort of suggesting that a CL fixed camera variation may appear next year, as Leica accepts some of its user base do not want interchangeable lens cameras.. like myself. Maybe something that answers our prayers will come. An EVF in the X113, with an upgraded sensor and AF module would satisfy my need. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Albertson Posted December 15, 2017 Share #24 Posted December 15, 2017 I picked up (that's all) a CL at the Leica store in London, and it's pretty close in size to the X2. Very nice. It's really tempting, though most of what I'd shoot with it I shoot with my X2 now, and the prints I get from the X2 are quite good. The electric viewfinder of the CL looks good, though. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
willeica Posted December 15, 2017 Share #25 Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) Its possible to precisely match the performance of the Lens to the Sensor. Takes us back to the I Model A and the I Model C (non standardised) where the 50mm lens had to be matched with the particular camera on which it is mounted. Some technicians still do this by using the little hole at the back with a ground glass screen and putting shims behind the lens. I was not aware up to now that this could be done with a digital camera. Standardised Leica mounts have only been around since 1931. I suppose they might perfect it some day. William Edited December 15, 2017 by willeica Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 30, 2017 Share #26 Posted December 30, 2017 There is a chap who is linked to a Leica dealer sort of suggesting that a CL fixed camera variation may appear next year, as Leica accepts some of its user base do not want interchangeable lens cameras.. like myself. Maybe something that answers our prayers will come. An EVF in the X113, with an upgraded sensor and AF module would satisfy my need. A CQ? Not a bad idea, maybe. But I do think the CL has killed the X Vario concept. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted December 30, 2017 Share #27 Posted December 30, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) What size sensor would a CQ have, Jaap? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 30, 2017 Share #28 Posted December 30, 2017 APS-C I guess. Something like an X2 with a wider lens and the CL sensor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgenper Posted December 31, 2017 Share #29 Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) APS-C I guess. Something like an X2 with a wider lens and the CL sensor Heaven forbid.... . Bought a mint X2 some months ago, and love it. Only thing I would want for change is a *longer* lens, about 50 mm equivalent. Absolutely not shorter! I even have a wild idea about a manually retractable lens, similar to the classical Elmar 50, that one took the responsibility to handle as needed, not the camera retracting it after a few minutes... Don´t know if that soution would be compatible with AF, but OTOH why not? Edited December 31, 2017 by elgenper Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS1969 Posted February 4, 2018 Share #30 Posted February 4, 2018 I would suggest that the sensor would be the current CL sensor. I would go for the same 35mm lens, or similar, to the X 113, and then add the option to shoot digitally at 50mm ala the Q, and thus you cover off two options in one hit.. where as the Q does 3, 28mm 35mm and 50mm using a digital zoom option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS1969 Posted February 4, 2018 Share #31 Posted February 4, 2018 Heaven forbid.... . Bought a mint X2 some months ago, and love it. Only thing I would want for change is a *longer* lens, about 50 mm equivalent. Absolutely not shorter! I even have a wild idea about a manually retractable lens, similar to the classical Elmar 50, that one took the responsibility to handle as needed, not the camera retracting it after a few minutes... Don´t know if that soution would be compatible with AF, but OTOH why not? I would suggest that the sensor would be that of the current CL. To draw in the 50mm brigade, I would use a solution similar to the Q, the digital option for other lenses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS1969 Posted February 4, 2018 Share #32 Posted February 4, 2018 I would suggest that the sensor would be the current CL sensor. I would go for the same 35mm lens, or similar, to the X 113, and then add the option to shoot digitally at 50mm ala the Q, and thus you cover off two options in one hit.. where as the Q does 3, 28mm 35mm and 50mm using a digital zoom option. This is an error, think I pressed the wrong button - oops. my apologies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgenper Posted February 6, 2018 Share #33 Posted February 6, 2018 This is an error, think I pressed the wrong button - oops. my apologies. OK, I just thought you had replied something unprintable to my post... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS1969 Posted February 6, 2018 Share #34 Posted February 6, 2018 OK, I just thought you had replied something unprintable to my post... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now