jip Posted September 15, 2017 Share #101 Posted September 15, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I love to see the OLD VS NEW autofocus motors just so we can take a look what they changed... really curious what makes it 'unbreakable' according to Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 15, 2017 Posted September 15, 2017 Hi jip, Take a look here AF Drive Problems Leica S Lenses: Official Statement by Leica. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Photon42 Posted September 15, 2017 Share #102 Posted September 15, 2017 Didn't they use some sort of nylon gear, which then was replaced by something proper? Which may raise the question whether the part taking the rotation impulse after the gears is actually fit for the increased force ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McMaster Posted September 15, 2017 Share #103 Posted September 15, 2017 It will be 3 weeks door to door for my 35mm to get a new motor, sent direct to Wetzlar with Leica supplied UPS label. john - north of the Highlands 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted September 15, 2017 Share #104 Posted September 15, 2017 It will be 3 weeks door to door for my 35mm to get a new motor, sent direct to Wetzlar with Leica supplied UPS label. john - north of the Highlands John I sent my Noctilux to Berlin to get it serviced after the bayonet pulled out of the lens body..........2 week turn around from Malaysia to Germany and back.................well done Leica. Neil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted September 25, 2017 Share #105 Posted September 25, 2017 I needed to return my Summarit S 70CS lens as it developed the AF fault after 3 years and 20 000 exposures.I notified Leica Australia late on a Friday afternoon. They had a demo that they were able to loan me. Next business day I received the loan lens and my faulty one was collected.Today 5 weeks to the day mine is back and delivered to my door with pickup for the prepared return package. That is interstate in Australia both ways plus the return trip to Wetzlar.Leica Camera Australia's support was examplary for this and thanks to the availability of the demo loaner, I think this was the best possible outcome for me. Zero costs to me.My second S lens I use less. It is the same age. If the failure does not happen by 4 and a half years, I think that I shall send it for the preemptive service Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 25, 2017 Share #106 Posted September 25, 2017 My second S lens I use less. It is the same age. If the failure does not happen by 4 and a half years, I think that I shall send it for the preemptive service And that's when you'll pay. You're fortunate that the first lens broke and gave you a positive service experience. Try to remember it if you seek preemptive service. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted September 25, 2017 Share #107 Posted September 25, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) And that's when you'll pay. You're fortunate that the first lens broke and gave you a positive service experience. Try to remember it if you seek preemptive service. Jeff JeffLeica Germany really do have a fantastic CS. It’s just a case of opening up to them with your requirements and they take care of it. I have had so many problems with all my leica gear and Leica have stepped in and done what a good professional company would do........... fantastic fantastic....... got me for life. Neil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 25, 2017 Share #108 Posted September 25, 2017 You missed the point....again. One shouldn't have to pay for a company f**kup, no matter how good the service. Please don't bother responding to my posts...life has been more enjoyable not responding to yours. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted September 25, 2017 Share #109 Posted September 25, 2017 Hi Jeff, did you have to pay for the replacement and how many of your lenses failed? I have been lucky so far but I am interested to know in case one of my lenses fails. Regards, Tom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted September 25, 2017 Share #110 Posted September 25, 2017 Hi Jeff, did you have to pay for the replacement and how many of your lenses failed? I have been lucky so far but I am interested to know in case one of my lenses fails. Regards, Tom Tom Jeff doesn't have any S lenses .....but apparently knows all about them (and everything else) :) Neil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 25, 2017 Share #111 Posted September 25, 2017 Hi Jeff, did you have to pay for the replacement and how many of your lenses failed? I have been lucky so far but I am interested to know in case one of my lenses fails. Regards, Tom I returned my demo S006 and S zoom after testing last year, ultimately deciding not to invest in the system, in large part due to the lack of hadhold-ability in less than ideal light (the 007 and a prime would have been better), but also because of the reported failures and long turnaround from the US. A well known dealer even cautioned me at that time. Since then, I'm glad there's finally a fix, but am reluctant to trust Leica given their S lens repair policy (customer payment for preemptive fix). I owned the R system... and saw where that lead. But the M system has treated me well for over 30 years. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted September 25, 2017 Share #112 Posted September 25, 2017 Thanks for the feedback. It is sad how much trust has been lost in regards of those AF-failures and the communication. I am a user and fan of the S system, but I am living in Germany and therefore have a lot of good experience with service. I dont doubt the reported AF failures but on the other side I believe the system is much more reliable than some people believe. I still believe Leica would be clever to improve communication regarding such issues. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted September 25, 2017 Share #113 Posted September 25, 2017 And that's when you'll pay. You're fortunate that the first lens broke and gave you a positive service experience. Try to remember it if you seek preemptive service. Jeff Jeff of course I know that if I chose to send a lens for a preemptive service when it has not shown a fault, I have to pay for that under the current policy. That would be my choice and my judgement. Actually I pay for comprehensive insurance coverage of all of my S equipment and the only cost to me if it failed after 5 years would be the excess for anything that needs repair.I get it that you are unhappy with that policy. Generally my experiences have been very positive but I always share if not as well. That's honest and fair feedback shared with forum members Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 25, 2017 Share #114 Posted September 25, 2017 Jeff of course I know that if I chose to send a lens for a preemptive service when it has not shown a fault, I have to pay for that under the current policy. That would be my choice and my judgement. Actually I pay for comprehensive insurance coverage of all of my S equipment and the only cost to me if it failed after 5 years would be the excess for anything that needs repair. I get it that you are unhappy with that policy. Generally my experiences have been very positive but I always share if not as well. That's honest and fair feedback shared with forum members Geoff, I don't challenge your judgment, nor suggest that anyone else share my opinion. In the long run, I want Leica to be successful....that helps everyone... so the more S customers the better. But I still think Leica's overall response to the lens debacle (communication, delays and ultimate policy) has been shameful. And, as I noted, one reputable dealer shared with me his disgust at the treatment of his many S customers. I, too, carry comprehensive insurance, but that doesn't count in my assessment. I truly hope things improve, but I'll remain on the S sidelines until they show me more. The SL system seems reliable, so that's a good step. I'm curious how it's doing relative to sales expectations. Jeff 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted September 26, 2017 Share #115 Posted September 26, 2017 Jeff, I have heard it said more than once that everything before the word "but" in a statement should be ignored :-) Yes I understand your viewpoint. I wouldn't expect anyone's viewpoint to change as a result of forum discussions in any event but we all contribute our personal experiences and views. We all judge what makes sense for ourselves.I have an SL too. I just added up and I have made over 36 000 exposures with S cameras so far, since starting with a third hand S2. About 7 500 with my SL. For my photography I am very pleased to continue with the S system. I can also say that the SL of course cannot produce the same results for me, while having its own strengths. For MY photography the S system advantages are clear cut and worth it. the new forecast SL lenses sound superb too, whenever they get to market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 26, 2017 Share #116 Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) Jeff, I have heard it said more than once that everything before the word "but" in a statement should be ignored :-) Yes I understand your viewpoint. I wouldn't expect anyone's viewpoint to change as a result of forum discussions in any event but we all contribute our personal experiences and views. We all judge what makes sense for ourselves. I have an SL too. I just added up and I have made over 36 000 exposures with S cameras so far, since starting with a third hand S2. About 7 500 with my SL. For my photography I am very pleased to continue with the S system. I can also say that the SL of course cannot produce the same results for me, while having its own strengths. For MY photography the S system advantages are clear cut and worth it. the new forecast SL lenses sound superb too, whenever they get to market. Indeed. Jeff Edited September 26, 2017 by Jeff S Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted September 26, 2017 Share #117 Posted September 26, 2017 Jeff, I have heard it said more than once that everything before the word "but" in a statement should be ignored :-) Yes I understand your viewpoint. I wouldn't expect anyone's viewpoint to change as a result of forum discussions in any event but we all contribute our personal experiences and views. We all judge what makes sense for ourselves. I have an SL too. I just added up and I have made over 36 000 exposures with S cameras so far, since starting with a third hand S2. About 7 500 with my SL. For my photography I am very pleased to continue with the S system. I can also say that the SL of course cannot produce the same results for me, while having its own strengths. For MY photography the S system advantages are clear cut and worth it. the new forecast SL lenses sound superb too, whenever they get to market. GeoffI sold my SL yesterday as it’s just to big to be a walk about Camera especially with the monstrosity of the SL lenses....... there a joke. I now have the TL2 as a back up to my S. The files from what I have seen up to now are as good as the SL and maybe a little better than the M10 which I find way to saturated for my liking. With a new S just around the corner we will just have to wait and see what surprises Leica have up there sleeve Neil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted September 27, 2017 Share #118 Posted September 27, 2017 Indeed. Jeff Jeff after I used "but" there is nothing negative. I won't part quote you. Nothing more positive to be gained in our conversation now I guess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 27, 2017 Share #119 Posted September 27, 2017 It was a joke, Geoff. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted September 27, 2017 Share #120 Posted September 27, 2017 It was a joke, Geoff. Jeff exactly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now