Jump to content

Lenshood for ZM 2.8/21


NZDavid

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I spotted this generic lenshood and wondered if it might fit my Zeiss ZM 2.8/21? It's described as a "brand new tilted vented metal lento 58mm to fit lenses with a 46mm filter thread."

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing the lengths people will go through to avoid paying for the right hood.

 

The Zeiss hood designed to be used with this lens is what you need to be using. The item shown above looks like something made for a 50mm lens and may, or may not, work with a lens as wide as 35mm, but will surely cut off part of the image field on a 21mm lens when you see how wide the designed hood is.

 

Just buy the hood that's designed to be used with it, or use it without one. It's a real shame Cosina didn't just up the prices a little bit and include the hoods with their lenses. Any lens that costs $1,500 new should include the hood.

 

Zeiss (Cosina) hood designed for the 21mm f2.8..

 

1457711367000_361532.jpg

 

s-l1600.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It does indeed look not quite as deep as the hood on my 21mm f2.8 Elmarit ASPH as I compare.

 

The second image with the hood next to the lens I just added makes it appear a little deeper than the first product shot, and at $84 (B&H) it is going to cost more than the $10-$30 those cheap Chinese-knock-offs sell for on eBay, but way less than the $200 it would cost me to buy a genuine Leica 12592 replacement hood for my 21mm f2.8 Elmarit ASPH, and that's just the hood. It takes another $40 to get the replacement 14041 hood cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used 25/28mm Zeiss round lens hood on Biogon-C 21mm f4.5 lens without any noticeable vignette, mind you it was used on film camera. As question is about 21mm f2.8 lens as Jaap said [post#3], there's only one way to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no experience with ZM ultra-wides but as far as my lenses are concerned, 21mm hoods are either bulky (M 21/2.8 asph, R 21/4) or ineffective (CV 21/4, M 21/3.4 asph, OM 21/2), there is no free lunch. I fear that the OP's will vignette severely but i may be wrong. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice so far. I got the lens sans hood and it's a beauty. No big problems (indoors and out) but I think it deserves a hood, mainly to counter flare but also of course for protection. That round hood is only $8 versus $80 for the Zeiss one! I tend to agree vignetting may be a problem. Using wider apertures helps in that regard, but I suspect the square one is designed that way for a reason. As a comparison, I keep the square hood permanently on my 2.8/24 Elmarit and find it works well. 35 Summicron also has a rectangular hood. Hmm, perhaps round hoods are best only for longer lenses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Round hoods are only good for two things:

1. Holding series filters, a la the Leica 12504

2. Easy manufacture.

There is no other reason to have a round hood for a rectangular (or square) image. You could make the lens elements rectangular (or square) too except for point #2 above...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original hood is a joy to handle with, it's a piece of precision especially made for the 21/25mm Zeissies.

I love even to play with it in my fingers, perhaps I'm a bit of hood-afficinado.... :ph34r:

 

With an eye on the buck I'd recommend this one, metal, sturdy & a bargain:

http://www.ebay.de/itm/46mm-46-Professional-Wide-Angle-Metal-Lens-Hood-46mm-Screw-In-46mm-Filter-Thread-/291823388306?hash=item43f2078692:g:b1UAAOSwNSxVI6Mv

 

Thomas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...