Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The IR filter arrived! Here are a couple of test shots from the backyard. It seems I can't get the amazing deep dark sky of the photo of RK+Q. It was overcast, maybe if the sky is clear I will get a darker sky? For now I am quite happy to be honest. Thank you for the inspiration RK+Q! If we meet some time I owe you a beer!

Nice try! I most like the second picture.

Yes, when you have clear sky you can get a dark sky in the infrared-picture.

But some clouds are good, they can make the picture more interesting.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by RK+Q
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

and here in B&W. for some reason, there's a tremendous amount of noise in this photo and I was restrained in what I could do to bring out the contrast.

If you never shoot before infrared-pictures you should follow some rules:

The best result you get in bright sunshine, that means no clouds schould cover the sun.

You should have the sun always in the back.

With the Q you should set the ISO to 400 or if you need faster shutterspeed 800.  I mostly use apertures betwen 8 and 11. With a normal IR-Filter you can´t shoot without a tripod.

Then, in the postprocessing (developing in LR or PS) you should convert in greyscale, turn up the contrast and clarity and turn down the shadows.

Like my example some posts before...

 

I shoot before IR-Photos with some diferent cameras (Canon 60D, 5DII, Ricoh GX100, Pana LX7) but with the Q it worked best.

 

In this example there where to much clouds in the sky but it can work anyway...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by RK+Q
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you never shoot before infrared-pictures you should follow some rules:

The best result you get in bright sunshine, that means no clouds schould cover the sun.

You should have the sun always in the back.

With the Q you should set the ISO to 400 or if you need faster shutterspeed 800.  I mostly use apertures betwen 8 and 11. With a normal IR-Filter you can´t shoot without a tripod.

Then, in the postprocessing (developing in LR or PS) you should convert in greyscale, turn up the contrast and clarity and turn down the shadows.

Like my example some posts before...

 

I shoot before IR-Photos with some diferent cameras (Canon 60D, 5DII, Ricoh GX100, Pana LX7) but with the Q it worked best.

 

In this example there where to much clouds in the sky but it can work anyway...

thanks so very much for this help. IIRC, I was shooting at ridiculously high ISO, hence the noise. So, I need to keep the ISO down and use a tripod. thanks. BTW, you probably know that there's a place that converts sensors to IR, not that I'd do it to the Q:

https://kolarivision.com/?s=adapter&post_type=product

Link to post
Share on other sites

and here in B&W. for some reason, there's a tremendous amount of noise in this photo and I was restrained in what I could do to bring out the contrast.

 

Thats a good first try! Did you try to edit it in jpg or in RAW? I fount that JPG didn't allow me a lot of space for editing

 

 

Nice try! I most like the second picture.

Yes, when you have clear sky you can get a dark sky in the infrared-picture.

But some clouds are good, they can make the picture more interesting.

 

Thanks! I also love your new one! So dramatic! And thank you so much for the tips about the ISO! I tried too high of an ISO and used a lot of noise reduction on mine making them look quite plastic. I didn't know that the Q was capable of such good IR photos!!! To be honest I haven't seen out there something taken from another camera that does a better IR impression than your photos. 

 

Looking forward for a better weather to get some dark skies. Alas here in UK its constantly overcast!!

Edited by zampelis
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a good first try! Did you try to edit it in jpg or in RAW? I fount that JPG didn't allow me a lot of space for editing

 

Thanks, yes, I shoot only RAW. But my ISO was way over the top, I think 25k. Should have realized I needed a tripod for it to bring back down the ISO. Tomorrow!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hansestadt Rostock | Universitätsplatz

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Trellis

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hacklebarney State Park, NJ

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chester, NJ

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chester, NJ.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hacklebarney State Park, NJ

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Koyasan 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Tunki
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having shot I/R images for years, both in film and more latterly in digital, it was invigorating to see a few new ones with the Q.

 

Coinciding with a Q arriving, and the rain clearing, I tried an old 720Nm filter I had from years back.

 

Q, with a (Leica) table-top tripod, resting on a fence post. Not exactly spellbinding subject matter, but it proved to me that it can work.

 

Gary

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Windmill

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing picture. Thank you: you are an inspiration on infrared.

do you have the exif of the photo? 

Thank you!

With the Q it makes fun and -for me- infrared never worked so good as with the Q... :D

 

F 11

2 s

ISO 400

 

Normally I would set the ISO on 100 or 200, but here it is a bit windy so I want to keep the exposuretime short. Because I want no blurred trees.;-)

Edited by RK+Q
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...