sixteen pads Posted February 15, 2017 Share #1 Posted February 15, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello Lads, I have been shooting Kentmere 100 for a minute now. Some of the rolls I tend to push to 400 and really loving the results. I find kentmere 100 when shoot at box speed to be sort of flat and pleasant in look but when rated at 400 it becomes angrier:) and with more character. Not bad for a 2.5$ dollar film. Attached pic of my son Milan. thanks ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 15, 2017 Posted February 15, 2017 Hi sixteen pads, Take a look here Kentmere 100 pushed to 400 on M6_lovely cheap punch. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
brill64 Posted February 15, 2017 Share #2 Posted February 15, 2017 lovely image.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixteen pads Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share #3 Posted February 15, 2017 one more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted February 15, 2017 Share #4 Posted February 15, 2017 Very nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted February 20, 2017 Share #5 Posted February 20, 2017 Beautiful tones. Are you developing and scanning this yourself? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixteen pads Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share #6 Posted February 20, 2017 Beautiful tones. Are you developing and scanning this yourself? Thank you fotografr, I have the film developed in my local lab and later scan myself with the Nikon Coolscan V. Does the job. I find the Nikon scanner getting sort of very deep into the negative, not sure how to explain it. Often times when I tried having my film scanned in pro labs I would end up with amazing quality scans with great color, clean reproduction and all that...but they kinda felt like amazing photos of my negatives. Almost too clean and a bit of outside of the negatives themselves. I felt some kind of medium separation, they were lacking something. When I looked at the photos I would be like " oh, that is a beautiful picture of my negative " haha. With the Nikon however I am more like " Oh, that's a lovely shot". The Nikon sort of brings the negative into the digital realm more organically I would say..but then again that could be just my impression and point of view on things since I am physically implicated in the scanning process. Anyways. thanks for looking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted February 21, 2017 Share #7 Posted February 21, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) The Coolscan V is a superb scanner. Mine broke down and Nikon has stopped making them now, so I have one by a different manufacturer. It's okay, but will never match the Coolscan V. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bateleur Posted February 21, 2017 Share #8 Posted February 21, 2017 Great tones indeed! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootinglulu Posted February 22, 2017 Share #9 Posted February 22, 2017 not bad! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixteen pads Posted March 9, 2017 Author Share #10 Posted March 9, 2017 another little frame I picked up today. kentmere 100 pushed to 400 with Leica M2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.