pico Posted February 13, 2017 Share #1 Posted February 13, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I don't know where to post this. I've been reading the posts regarding ISO vs whatever. High digital ISO opens doors to possibilities that olde phartes like me could not imagine. Enjoy it! A photo taken in a large farm kitchen with one bare 60W light bulb in a 12' ceiling. If I were better prepared I would have used a bounced electronic flash but, nooo I was a 'Leica' photographer. Leica M4 with 85mm F/1.8 Canon lens. Film: Kodak 2475 pushed in HC-110. Scanned from a print on Agfa Brovira grade #6. Extreme! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Hi pico, Take a look here In the old days. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
waterlenz Posted February 13, 2017 Share #2 Posted February 13, 2017 We have come a long way with high ISO!!! When I was a teenager (late 60's) and living in Germany (army brat) I bought and shot a few rolls of Agfapan 1000 (not sure if this was available in the USA) at a rock concert - grain like golf balls! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted February 13, 2017 Share #3 Posted February 13, 2017 I remember using 2475 to shoot hockey games in our schools OLD stadium in the 1960s, to get a shutter speed suitable for action, developed in Acufine. I was amazed at the shadow detail - and the grain! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted February 13, 2017 Share #4 Posted February 13, 2017 Beautiful imagery Pico. Your usual standard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted February 13, 2017 Share #5 Posted February 13, 2017 I don't know where to post this. I've been reading the posts regarding ISO vs whatever. High digital ISO opens doors to possibilities that olde phartes like me could not imagine. Enjoy it! A photo taken in a large farm kitchen with one bare 60W light bulb in a 12' ceiling. If I were better prepared I would have used a bounced electronic flash but, nooo I was a 'Leica' photographer. Leica M4 with 85mm F/1.8 Canon lens. Film: Kodak 2475 pushed in HC-110. Scanned from a print on Agfa Brovira grade #6. Extreme! Beautiful, Pico! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted February 14, 2017 Share #6 Posted February 14, 2017 A lot of memory when I look at this kind of photo Pico And say that some photo softwares or even cameras that try to imitate this grainAnd why not directly shoot in film in this case ? great conservation of this negative no equivalent for the moment . Very nice picture for me ! like a painting Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stray cat Posted February 14, 2017 Share #7 Posted February 14, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Stunning picture Pico! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share #8 Posted February 14, 2017 great conservation of this negative no equivalent for the moment . Which reminds me that the original negative has degraded to almost nothing. I do not know if it is due to the Kodak 2475 film, or the hasty processing done at the time. All that is left is the original print. Bummer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted February 14, 2017 Share #9 Posted February 14, 2017 Which reminds me that the original negative has degraded to almost nothing. I do not know if it is due to the Kodak 2475 film, or the hasty processing done at the time. All that is left is the original print. Bummer. Pico , I have negatives and slides intact without any damage since 1969 which is exactly 48 years ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share #10 Posted February 14, 2017 Pico , I have negatives and slides intact without any damage since 1969 which is exactly 48 years ! I have a lot of negatives, too, however at times I worked under precious deadlines and did not sufficiently wash a few rolls. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted February 14, 2017 Share #11 Posted February 14, 2017 ... at the opposite , I lost hundreds of digital photos saved in a 500 MB Western Digital hard drive (which WD can not recover either). In the "I like film" thread there are even pictures of 1955 that are posted H. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmitchell Posted February 14, 2017 Share #12 Posted February 14, 2017 What a beautiful photo. Using flash would have changed the feeling of this photo completely. It is perfect the way it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterlenz Posted February 14, 2017 Share #13 Posted February 14, 2017 Which reminds me that the original negative has degraded to almost nothing. I do not know if it is due to the Kodak 2475 film, or the hasty processing done at the time. All that is left is the original print. Bummer. Maybe not enough fixation???? Depleted fixer or not long enough time????? May have needed more fixation due to thicker emulsion????? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share #14 Posted February 14, 2017 Maybe not enough fixation???? Depleted fixer or not long enough time????? May have needed more fixation due to thicker emulsion????? How would an answer help? . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemgb Posted February 15, 2017 Share #15 Posted February 15, 2017 I still like taking photos like this, grain is good! Ilford Delta 3200, exposed at 1600, developed for 3200, M2, 50mm Summicron. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/269343-in-the-old-days/?do=findComment&comment=3213204'>More sharing options...
Martin B Posted February 15, 2017 Share #16 Posted February 15, 2017 Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin B Posted February 15, 2017 Share #17 Posted February 15, 2017 Love how the light sneaks around the pillars from behind....which can be only seen on film this way: Leica M7, Ilford Delta 3600 used with ISO 3600, developed with Xtol. CV 21/1.8 lens And something a bit spooky : Leica M6, Kodak Tri-X 400 pushed to ISO 1600, developed with Xtol. CV 35/1.2 II lens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayD28 Posted March 5, 2017 Share #18 Posted March 5, 2017 That's a lovely photo, Pico. Captures a wonderful mood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aesop Posted March 6, 2017 Share #19 Posted March 6, 2017 Which reminds me that the original negative has degraded to almost nothing. I do not know if it is due to the Kodak 2475 film, or the hasty processing done at the time. All that is left is the original print. Bummer. ...stuff of nightmares. Eek! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobbu2 Posted April 30, 2017 Share #20 Posted April 30, 2017 Lovely shot Pico. Ahhh, Kodak 2475.... I used it all the time when I was in high school as the school newspaper and yearbook photo geek for all the night sports and theatrical events. I also used a lot of 120 Royal-X in my Yashica TLR; probably not the best materials by today's standards but they got the job done! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.