Jump to content

how about M10Mono


esquire53

Recommended Posts

M10-P as sure as night follows day. Then M10M. Then M10 with ping pong rubber, M10 Safari Edition.... Then (in 2020-ish) the M11.

Hi Wattsy,

I think we miss the M10 Titanium before the ping pong rubber Mt Everest version ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica, take your time with the next monochrome. My 246 is only a year plus old, so no rush! But I will be interested when it comes available. And if it could be more like the M-D please, but keep the EVF ability. That would be great. Less is more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"

Leica will withiut a doubt take their time with an M10 Monochrom. They will most likely wait until the M10 sales and the M246 sales drop.

"

Right, but if we wait until the sales drops, we might see it earlier rather than later ...

actually, I would like to see it

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Monochrom M10 is a very interesting concept - one which will  without doubt sooner or later appear on the market.

I agree, but Leica has used a newly developed  sensor. Unless it is designed as a monochrome version at the same time, modifying the filter stack will take some time - and money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Monochrom M10 is a very interesting concept...

 

Going by previous Monochroms, an MM10 might offer ISO 400-150,000.

And given that the eye is far more accepting of noise in monochrome, the upper bounds of useful ISO (for me) might be as high as 19,200.

Crazy-high.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would that work?

Instead of a bayer color filter, use a clear plus ND filter grid.

In low exposure zones the clear pixels smooth out the ND pixels

In mid zones both ND and clear pixels give full resolution.

In highlights the ND pixels fill in the clipped pixels.

 

Alternatively use photodiodes with different sizes in a custom sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of a bayer color filter, use a clear plus ND filter grid.

In low exposure zones the clear pixels smooth out the ND pixels

In mid zones both ND and clear pixels give full resolution.

In highlights the ND pixels fill in the clipped pixels.

Alternatively use photodiodes with different sizes in a custom sensor.

Interesting idea, basically increasing the exposure range of the sensor at the expense of ISO performance and possibly resolution due to interpolation.

But wouldn't it just be better to have tools that can indicate when the highlights are clipping excessively?

Perhaps that would detract from simplicity of operation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of a bayer color filter, use a clear plus ND filter grid.

In low exposure zones the clear pixels smooth out the ND pixels

In mid zones both ND and clear pixels give full resolution.

In highlights the ND pixels fill in the clipped pixels.

 

Alternatively use photodiodes with different sizes in a custom sensor.

 

what would a ND do differently than a proper exposure compensation or exposure setting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The (presumed, hoped-for) appearance of an M10 Monochrom is the biggest reason I'm something on the fence with the new M10. I use and enjoy my Monochrom's far more than my M240.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...