chris_tribble Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1441 Posted January 12, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) You got this from Buzzfeed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 12, 2017 Posted January 12, 2017 Hi chris_tribble, Take a look here Leica M 10. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
keithlaban.co.uk Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1442 Posted January 12, 2017 You got this from Buzzfeed? No, Trump. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UliWer Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1443 Posted January 12, 2017 He wouldn't know the word "proletariat". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1444 Posted January 12, 2017 [...] seems to me that sensor technology has pretty much leveled off [...] As a leicanonikosonypanaepsoricoh digital user for 15+ years my feeling is each new sensor generation brings cleaner high isos and it's not tomorrow that such evolution will stop if you ask me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithlaban.co.uk Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1445 Posted January 12, 2017 He wouldn't know the word "proletariat". True, must have been Putin causing mischief again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent M10 Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1446 Posted January 12, 2017 As a leicanonikosonypanaepsoricoh digital user for 15+ years my feeling is each new sensor generation brings cleaner high isos and it's not tomorrow that such evolution will stop if you ask me. It isn't a question of evolution, but one of degree. What evolutionary jumps or leaps have occurred in the last 3 to 4 years that has called for shelling out another $3K or $4K? Nikon is still selling its 810 as one of its top DSLRs and that came out in 2014. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UliWer Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1447 Posted January 12, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) True, must of been Putin causing mischief again. Wouldn't publish on "Rumor" sites, but let Mr. Assange do the Job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1448 Posted January 12, 2017 No, Trump. This new Leica is gonna be the most beautiful thing God ever made... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithlaban.co.uk Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1449 Posted January 12, 2017 This new Leica is gonna be the most beautiful thing God ever made... ...and Mexico will pay for it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cirke Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1450 Posted January 12, 2017 and no new lenses rumored ? a 35 Noctilux ? :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1451 Posted January 12, 2017 It isn't a question of evolution, but one of degree. What evolutionary jumps or leaps have occurred in the last 3 to 4 years that has called for shelling out another $3K or $4K? [...] Depends if you need high isos for your photography. If you don't the M240 is perfectly usable as is with any good raw converter. But you may have to use Dfine or other noise reducer at 3200/6400 iso and above. Not a big deal with fast lenses provided thin DoF is not a problem for you. But with my Macro-Elmar 90/4 i needed 12800 iso for this snap (http://tinyurl.com/jatys97) handheld for instance. Easy task for my A7s mod but my M240 was not the better camera for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1452 Posted January 12, 2017 This new Leica is gonna be the most beautiful thing God ever made... It's gonna be huuuuge! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerndReini Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1453 Posted January 12, 2017 For a serious reason to upgrade -sensorwise- the M10 should really better these three substantially. These cameras are all listed at 13+ stops. What is the absolute highest DR any digital camera has been tested with? 15? DR is the new obsession of serious amateurs, while most Pros shoot Canons, which have the lowest DR in some of these tests. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1454 Posted January 12, 2017 Depends if you need high isos for your photography. If you don't the ..... ..... M9 is fine for an awful of of photography . The quest for ever better says more about human nature than the genuine 'need' for a new camera. And it keeps manufacturers in business. Interesting that manufacturers can't win. If they cease supporting a camera they get criticised. If they manufactre it for too long they get criticised. Leica are in a no win situation at this stage of speculation I'd say . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicaiste Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1455 Posted January 12, 2017 I hope it will not be a down as after the X Vario release.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1456 Posted January 12, 2017 I liked much my Digilux 1 as well. 100 iso was fine but 200 iso was a no no . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerndReini Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1457 Posted January 12, 2017 I hope it will not be a down as after the X Vario release.... The M10 will be a success and sell nicely is my prediction. There are enough Leica fans, who upgrade every cycle, and many in the starter wholes with M9s, who will be able to justify the purchase after skipping a generation. After all, there really is no alternative to an M as far as pure joy of photography goes (at least for me.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1458 Posted January 12, 2017 Day -1 for me :-) I am looking daily to Jono's blog and Facebook , But he would not even talk under torture :-) You don't need to torture me, I'll always talk - just try to stop me! It seems that the camera has followed Roger Cicala's camera introduction graph already - and that it couldn't possibly fail to be a real disappointment (to some people at least). On the other hand, with so many diverse wants it's probable that it'll please some people as well! I've looked at the pictures, and I've read all the specs, but it seems to me that the days of judging a camera by it's specs should be past - it's how it works that matters rather than which boxes it ticks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cirke Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1459 Posted January 12, 2017 I agree but it is difficult not to be excited when a new M is coming , even if we don't really need it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted January 12, 2017 Share #1460 Posted January 12, 2017 I agree but it is difficult not to be excited when a new M is coming , even if we don't really need it Oh! I'm really excited too - a new M is the biggest treat - not least for all the fun on the forum. I just meant that camera reviews tend to stick to the measurable - and especially specification boxes to tick, which isn't terribly relevant . . . and leaky tick boxes even less so! best Jono Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.