Ron Weissman Posted August 10, 2016 Share #1 Â Posted August 10, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) For those of you who have actually used the new 35mm T:I've used a Summilux M FLE on the T and focusing has been quite easy. Can't say I've missed more than 1% of the shots. But have heard great things about the 35 T. In addition to autofocus and probably better in-camera lens correction (I have no idea to what extent the T applies lens corrections through the Leica M to T adapter), am I missing anything by sticking with the faster (and brilliant) M FLE rather than using the 35MM T? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 Hi Ron Weissman, Take a look here 35MM T vs. 35MM Summilux M FLE, opinons, please. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
luele Posted August 10, 2016 Share #2  Posted August 10, 2016 Hi,  have a look here, there are some pictures with both lenses   http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/226003-post-your-t-shots-here/?p=3088759   Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Weissman Posted August 10, 2016 Author Share #3  Posted August 10, 2016 Thank you. Exactly what I was looking for. Since  i do a fair amount of floral photography, the improved minimum focusing distance is quite relevant--a variable I hadn't considered.  And the photos are beautiful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom0511 Posted August 15, 2016 Share #4 Â Posted August 15, 2016 For me the most obvious difference is AF. I havent compared IQ since both lenses are excellent and I use the M lens on the M and the TL lens on the T. Without having done comparisons I would say the TL lens has maybe the nicer and smoother bokeh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.