hteasley Posted October 31, 2015 Share #1 Â Posted October 31, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Comparing the T's Visoflex to the EVF in the Q, and by all reports the EVF in the SL, the T falls somewhat short. In using the Visoflex, I've been a little unhappy with the performance and resolution, and my overall scene impression from shooting with the Visoflex, and seeing what got captured later. Â Â I don't know how the EVF in the Visoflex is driven: is it video hardware within the Visoflex itself driving the EVF, or is it driven from hardware in the camera? Is that hardware being taxed with the resolution of the Visoflex now? Would it be possible to have a higher resolution, higher refresh rate Visoflex II someday? Â It would be great, if possible. I think it would make for a worthwhile upgrade. Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 31, 2015 Posted October 31, 2015 Hi hteasley, Take a look here Would an updated Visoflex be possible?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Willy ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° Posted October 31, 2015 Share #2  Posted October 31, 2015 Theoretically anything is possible. The EVF (w.o knowing specs) in my Nikon 1 V3 has a much more natural rendering than the T's. No banding, no pixel jumping/shifting. I'm certain some upgrade might be possible via firmware, better yet, via hardware, and I cannot imagine anyone owning it delaying an upgrade and spend some serious bucks to get a better overall rendering, resolution and responsiveness. Wait and see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted October 31, 2015 Share #3  Posted October 31, 2015 Comparing the T's Visoflex to the EVF in the Q, and by all reports the EVF in the SL, the T falls somewhat short. In using the Visoflex, I've been a little unhappy with the performance and resolution, and my overall scene impression from shooting with the Visoflex, and seeing what got captured later.   I don't know how the EVF in the Visoflex is driven: is it video hardware within the Visoflex itself driving the EVF, or is it driven from hardware in the camera? Is that hardware being taxed with the resolution of the Visoflex now? Would it be possible to have a higher resolution, higher refresh rate Visoflex II someday?  It would be great, if possible. I think it would make for a worthwhile upgrade.   i have no complaints about the Viso 020 … have you adjusted the diopter correction, brightness and colour to suit your eyes?  dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hteasley Posted October 31, 2015 Author Share #4  Posted October 31, 2015 i have no complaints about the Viso 020 … have you adjusted the diopter correction, brightness and colour to suit your eyes?  dunk I have adjusted it, and it's OK, but I'd buy a new one with a quickness if the one from the Q got turned into a Visoflex II for the T. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-photo Posted October 31, 2015 Share #5  Posted October 31, 2015 I am happy with it too, I think it is really bright and also bigger than the Q, in fact bigger than many viewfinder which I prefer  I think if it ever will be a new visoflex it will probably be for a new camera system working with all latest cameras. New X comes to mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted October 31, 2015 Share #6 Â Posted October 31, 2015 Would an updated Visoflex be possible! Â Yes. Â Will we see one for the current T body? Â I think not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpopescu Posted November 3, 2015 Share #7 Â Posted November 3, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Anything is possible, in theory, however not everything is probable. An update on the viewfinder may be well impossible in fact, if the communication bandwidth between the two electronic components is nearly saturated now with the current resolution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReturningToFilm Posted November 3, 2015 Share #8 Â Posted November 3, 2015 I don't own a T (yet) but tried one out at Leica Mayfair yesterday, including the Visioflex, the first time I used it. There was definitely some lag, initially at it coming "online" when putting my eye to it and also when tracking in the store. Was an interesting experience coming from manual film cameras or old canon dSLR with OVF. If some firmware would improve these issues I would see a benefit, for sure, but suspect I would become accustomed to it with time. Slightly off topic but I have to say that the T really felt like a great tool in the hand, much more so (sadly for the wallet) than the X...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.