Jump to content

The 90mm Summicron APO for portraits


douglas fry

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here are some portraits I have done with the M (Typ 240) and Summilux-M 50mm ASPH.

 

#1 NOT cropped

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

#2 NOT cropped

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

#3 NOT cropped

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

#4 Cropped vertical from a horizontal shot (plenty of pixels on the M240)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You see #3, where her hand is Bigger than their faces? That's what 50mm does.

 

Excellent for environmental portraits, full body and so on. But not for head and shoulders unless you want to introduce very unflattering distortions.

 

That is all very basic knowledge :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Mr Cat earlier........

 

The 90/2 wide open is barely usable on an M ....... and both RF and lens have to be exactly calibrated for all distances to get consistent results.

 

I found it more difficult to use than the nocti 50/0.95 ..... where at least you have a large diameter body and longer throw to allow more accurate adjustment when focussing.

 

This is the one Leica lens I did not like, could not get consistent results with and sold fairly quickly.

 

The 75/2 in contrast is a delight to use and much easier ....... there are minimal downsides to losing 15mm of FL and major benefits. (although this is another lens with pesky floating elements.....  and Leica took several goes to get it adjusted correctly)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Mr Cat earlier........

 

The 90/2 wide open is barely usable on an M ...[...]

 

Beware of cats! :D My 90/2 apo works as well as my other (good) lenses as long as i don't ask the impossible from it e.g. to be perfectly sharp on closeups because it is a bit soft there but everybody knows that already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You see #3, where her hand is Bigger than their faces? That's what 50mm does.

[...]

 

That is all very basic knowledge :)

Yes, even kids know that nearer objects look bigger :)

 

But what's wrong with that ?

 

There are no rules for art.

 

Overall, I find portraits with wide angles (even ultra wides) much more interesting and "real" than boring by-the-book tele portraits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or perhaps, more realistically, you never took classes?

There is no reason to be nasty, even insulting.  Where is it written that 50mm cannot be used for portraits? IMHO, a good eye and good technique are more important than following someone else's rules.   Do you have some comparisons you would like to post to demonstrate the validity of the "rule"?   I have tried the 90 Summicron too and abandoned it for much the same reasons other have stated.  I will sometimes use the Macro Elmar 90 f/4, which is easier to manage, and I will sometimes use a 50mm too.  The APO 50 is not the ideal lens for portraits but here is one that works -- at least I think so.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You see #3, where her hand is Bigger than their faces? That's what 50mm does.

 

Excellent for environmental portraits, full body and so on. But not for head and shoulders unless you want to introduce very unflattering distortions.

 

That is all very basic knowledge :)

Isn't the hand supposed to get the emphasis in that shot? Excellent use of perspective, There are times that basics should be used. Often, actually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Douglas do let us know your impressions .... i am very happy with mine. 

 

the EVF-2, i tried it .... egghhh - wasn't a fan but perhaps should take another look.  i would like to get a 135mm for some "once in a while" usage but i'm scared about trying to focus that lens at anything other than infinity :)

I have no trouble with 135 lenses using the EVF-2. It IS worth a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is why I find the 75mm a nice compromise. Easier to focus than a 90 but can give results that can be made to be close to a 50 or to a 90 (provided you have space to move in or move out). I think that this focal length is undeservedly under appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...