Jump to content

From M4 to......?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 2 weeks later...

I bought the M-A. I wanted a brand new Leica that I would be first to own, that was the main factor in my decision. Yes, I know that a used earlier model is much less expensive, but many of the them are literally a half-century old or older, and as a buyer, I don't know what their history is, if they need a service, if they've been serviced by someone competent, and so on.

 

As regards the MP vs M-A, I wanted the most basic photographic experience possible, and for that reason the M7 didn't interest me. I will say that you are forced to think about lighting when you use the M-A (or, I assume, the pre-M5 Leicas, which were the first to include a built-in meter). There are fallbacks like one of the iPhone light meter apps, and incident light meters if you would like to use them. But there is something fundamental to photography about having to really think about light and use your judgement to pick the appropriate aperture or shutter speed for the moment and the location. A built-in light meter may provide an easy answer, but it may equally deny you the opportunity of thinking about light and being aware of it in the moment.

 

I absolutely love the M-A, not just as a beautiful piece of design and engineering, but for the experience of taking photographs with it. Like many others, I've been coddled by digital photography for many years. The M-A is a completely different and personally reinvigorating experience of engagement with the process of taking photographs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the M-A. I wanted a brand new Leica that I would be first to own, that was the main factor in my decision. Yes, I know that a used earlier model is much less expensive, but many of the them are literally a half-century old or older, and as a buyer, I don't know what their history is, if they need a service, if they've been serviced by someone competent, and so on.

 

As regards the MP vs M-A, I wanted the most basic photographic experience possible, and for that reason the M7 didn't interest me. I will say that you are forced to think about lighting when you use the M-A (or, I assume, the pre-M5 Leicas, which were the first to include a built-in meter). There are fallbacks like one of the iPhone light meter apps, and incident light meters if you would like to use them. But there is something fundamental to photography about having to really think about light and use your judgement to pick the appropriate aperture or shutter speed for the moment and the location. A built-in light meter may provide an easy answer, but it may equally deny you the opportunity of thinking about light and being aware of it in the moment.

 

I absolutely love the M-A, not just as a beautiful piece of design and engineering, but for the experience of taking photographs with it. Like many others, I've been coddled by digital photography for many years. The M-A is a completely different and personally reinvigorating experience of engagement with the process of taking photographs.

 

Congratulations on the new camera! I totally get your reasoning, and would do the same if I were buying a new M. 

 

I would also suggest that you buy a decent (i.e. new/newish digital) light meter, one which also takes incident readings. Metering separately, and especially taking incident readings, makes you more aware of the light IMHO. In practice you take a reading then - with experience - adjust as you go by instinct. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

M-A is now one year old.

 

I don't know how many this model is selling, in one year time.

I bet that the selling number is profitable for Leica to offer it in future.

I'm glad that this model exist and would like to say long life to M-A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...