Guest Posted September 29, 2015 Share #41  Posted September 29, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration)  (I don't use a EVF btw) with the pleasure of the touchscreen and it's fluent and quick navigation is just amazing.  I have been wondering about that whether it was really necessary to use the EVF, so it is good to hear you can! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 Hi Guest, Take a look here Leica T? Or Not.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest Posted September 29, 2015 Share #42 Â Posted September 29, 2015 Q and T, one is full frame and fixed the other APS-C and not fixed lens. I would therefore think the 'roadmap' would be perhaps a shared 'T' mount for both the 'Q' and the 'T', the 'T' remaining APS-C and the 'Q' remaining full-frame. Â Two different systems. Shared mount (would reduce cost) - a foot in both segments of the market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leitztozeiss Posted September 29, 2015 Share #43 Â Posted September 29, 2015 At $900-1200 used for a T body, I say YES! Â And, I recently did just that..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 7, 2015 Share #44 Â Posted October 7, 2015 Given that new bodies are available now for $1,628 the $1,200 is actually pretty good IMO... Â Do you believe that the Q will do better once Leica announces a new interchangeable lens AF camera? Â I would be very surprised... Â And I can also guarantee you that you will not find the latest 2 zoom lenses for $900... Â Besides that I believe the OP has made an excellent choice. Agreed. I think if anything the Q with 28mm lens will drop somewhat as soon as interchangeable lenses appear for the Q, whereas the T I hope will continue with its system lenses and the M-Adaptor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 7, 2015 Share #45 Â Posted October 7, 2015 At $900-1200 used for a T body, I say YES! Â And, I recently did just that..... And .... are you happy with your choice? I have handled a body and the 18-55 so far and wow, those ooze quality. I get closer to purchasing one....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted October 7, 2015 Share #46  Posted October 7, 2015 Agreed. I think if anything the Q with 28mm lens will drop somewhat as soon as interchangeable lenses appear for the Q Interchangeable lenses for the Q require application of a saw and I cannot guarantee for the results. Also I don’t expect a price drop (except the resale value of a Q with its lens cut off plummeting). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 8, 2015 Share #47 Â Posted October 8, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) No they don't! They just need a new body! If that happened the Q with fixed lens would be considered inferior to the 'newest' Q body which had been given an interchangeable lens mount. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted October 8, 2015 Share #48 Â Posted October 8, 2015 No they don't! They just need a new body! If that happened the Q with fixed lens would be considered inferior to the 'newest' Q body which had been given an interchangeable lens mount. Â That will be the SL. Different camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bamajr711 Posted November 18, 2015 Share #49 Â Posted November 18, 2015 I bought a used T with 18-56 for 1595.00 then was able to purchase the 23mm cron for $860.00.. I was just a little disappointed at the speed of 18-56 as the flash is not very good. The F2 cron fixed everything as no flash is needed, focus is fast and ISO is good at 3200. The 18-56 is great outdoors and super sharp. Sold my X2 and Fuji x-e1 and now only shoot the T. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.