Jump to content

Apple: Aperture is dead


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As I read it, iPhoto and Aperture will be rolled into one app, 'Photo'. Strange that Apple is dropping an 'i'. Trivial, I know.

.

 

Photo will not I am guessing be a serious app. For a start it will not have layers and without layers, it just does not cut the mustard as a pro app in any way.

 

I suspect the “i” may reappear in the final version. It may not be being used for the development version to differentiate it from the older.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Photo will not I am guessing be a serious app. For a start it will not have layers and without layers, it just does not cut the mustard as a pro app in any way.

 

 

 

I suspect the “i” may reappear in the final version. It may not be being used for the development version to differentiate it from the older.

 

 

 

Wilson

 

 

 

Aperture had layers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aperture had layers?

 

It has the equivalent where each brick can be the same as a layer and you can then do masks by using brushes.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Jeff. The system described requires as much work as I currently do to keep two computers synched for Photoshop work. Because my computers are desktops in different locations rather than a laptop and a desktop in one location, it gets a bit more complicated. If I feel a need to run LR as opposed to Photoshop I will come back to the nice video to which you linked. Set in my ways, I am comfortable with Photoshop and Bridge and comfort means something.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Jeff. The system described requires as much work as I currently do to keep two computers synched for Photoshop work. Because my computers are desktops in different locations rather than a laptop and a desktop in one location, it gets a bit more complicated. If I feel a need to run LR as opposed to Photoshop I will come back to the nice video to which you linked. Set in my ways, I am comfortable with Photoshop and Bridge and comfort means something.

 

Alan

 

Alan,

 

I am totally with you. When Adobe had an excellent library system in Bridge, which is totally intuitive and takes no learning at all, I cannot understand why they did not just port Bridge over to use as the library system on Lightroom. Synching libraries and folders using Bridge and Chronosync is so easy, a child could do it.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...