tompoes Posted May 7, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted May 7, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Have some fun: Â bigheadtaco.com: Leica T versus Fujifilm X-E2: Modern Art vs Retro Cool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 7, 2014 Posted May 7, 2014 Hi tompoes, Take a look here Leica T versus Fuji XE1. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
earleygallery Posted May 7, 2014 Share #2 Â Posted May 7, 2014 "The lens quality is also higher with the Leica, again at a much higher price point (optical corrections vs digital correction in camera)" - what makes you say this? Where is the link to the information that Leica have provided stating the lenses are optically corrected not digitally? Â Have you seen the thread about how Leica applies digital corrections, and the 'raw' shot showing quite extreme barrel distortion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
viramati Posted May 7, 2014 Share #3 Â Posted May 7, 2014 reiterates pretty much how I feel about this camera. Fuji will basically be a better photographers tool, T may have a slight edge on IQ (at base iso and in good light) and looks pretty sexy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tompoes Posted May 7, 2014 Author Share #4  Posted May 7, 2014 "The lens quality is also higher with the Leica, again at a much higher price point (optical corrections vs digital correction in camera)" - what makes you say this? Where is the link to the information that Leica have provided stating the lenses are optically corrected not digitally? Have you seen the thread about how Leica applies digital corrections, and the 'raw' shot showing quite extreme barrel distortion?  Not my words, just a reference to a link. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanG Posted May 7, 2014 Share #5 Â Posted May 7, 2014 I just glanced at the first picture on that link and it immediately hit me that the Fuji looks more like a Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
viramati Posted May 7, 2014 Share #6  Posted May 7, 2014 and the leica like a sexy version on the NEX7 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/226690-leica-t-versus-fuji-xe1/?do=findComment&comment=2585422'>More sharing options...
AlanG Posted May 7, 2014 Share #7  Posted May 7, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) and the leica like a sexy version on the NEX7[ATTACH]435589[/ATTACH]  They could not have been influenced by the Nex 7 since, Leica wrote, "Discover the whole story – and how Leica and the Leica T break entirely new ground in the world of photography."  No built in EVF either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garygraphy Posted May 28, 2014 Share #8  Posted May 28, 2014 "The lens quality is also higher with the Leica, again at a much higher price point (optical corrections vs digital correction in camera)" - what makes you say this? Where is the link to the information that Leica have provided stating the lenses are optically corrected not digitally? Have you seen the thread about how Leica applies digital corrections, and the 'raw' shot showing quite extreme barrel distortion?  this is quite amusing as Fuji has come out stating that their newer more expensive lenses (like the 23mm f1.4) handles distortion optically unlike Leica that is doing it digitally Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted May 28, 2014 Share #9 Â Posted May 28, 2014 The Fuji 23/1.4 is almost two times bulkier than the Summicron-T 23/2 though (72 x 63mm vs 63 x 37mm). Two times cheaper as well... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjh Posted May 28, 2014 Share #10 Â Posted May 28, 2014 this is quite amusing as Fuji has come out stating that their newer more expensive lenses (like the 23mm f1.4) handles distortion optically unlike Leica that is doing it digitally Both Fuji and Leica are relying on optical as well as digital corrections. Everyone does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted May 28, 2014 Share #11 Â Posted May 28, 2014 At different levels... The Fuji lens is almost distortion free optically, which is not the case of the Leica to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.