Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

more Biotar 7.5cm @ f1.5 :

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

f1 v2 1970's Noctilux on m240- with OUFRO close up ring- hard to do this before live view:rolleyes::

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

the lens itself- (via CV 35/1.2)- and the results with Oufro:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Christmas Day morning at Westonbirt Arboretum. M(Typ 240) + 1967 Summaron 35mm.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

weird! I was looking at this new thread- wondering if I am supposed to post my M240 images with old glass here or in the 'view through older glass' (VTOG) thread... then- scrolling down- I find I am already posted here? Are these posts now duplicated or have they been removed from the VTOG thread?

 

EDIT: I just looked and noticed that my images have been removed from the VTOG thread... Now: no offense to this thread- but (moderators) I would have preffered my images to stay where I posted them? The VTOG thread is not camera specific and I enjoy looking at different Leica M digital cameras in there- as well as images taken on good old film Leicas and even the S2? If all my shots will be moved from there to here: unless I pull out my m3 - I will no longer be able to participate in that thread?? Not entirely happy. In addition we now have various M8, MM, M240 and Non Camera Specific 'old glass' threads... a type of emergent 'camera apartheid'? This isn't necessary in the M lens forum- surely? Seems like the VTOG thread will only be of use to those shooting the M9, S2 or film cameras from here on in? Is the answer to have a different thread for every type of camera that can handle Leica glass? What next: 'the view through older glass on the Sony A7r' thread?

 

I only mention all this because the VTOG thread is my favourite on this forum... especially seeing as every single Leica lens I own is vintage ;-)

Edited by jaques
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

"Fat" Tele-Emarit 2.8/90mm bought new in 1968 for $196...

First a bit of characteristic flare doesn't hurt the photo of Birch leaves on Blue Spruce.

Second over the back fence with a small Maple and some naked Birch to show any CA or fringing.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Dougg
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mods,

 

I know that you are trying very hard to keep things tidy and the forum running smoothly, at which you all do an excellent job, but (if this has occurred) PLEASE do not remove and transfer pictures that members have posted in the 'View Through Older Glass' thread! Members have posted their pictures in that thread because it is deliberately 'camera agnostic' and is about the lenses whereas this thread is only about the Leica M (Typ 240). Please respect my wish as the starter of the View Through Older Glass thread and the posters' wishes; by all means copy pictures to this thread if you think it helps but PLEASE leave them in their original thread.

 

Pete.

 

weird! I was looking at this new thread- wondering if I am supposed to post my M240 images with old glass here or in the 'view through older glass' (VTOG) thread... then- scrolling down- I find I am already posted here? Are these posts now duplicated or have they been removed from the VTOG thread?

 

EDIT: I just looked and noticed that my images have been removed from the VTOG thread... Now: no offense to this thread- but (moderators) I would have preffered my images to stay where I posted them? The VTOG thread is not camera specific and I enjoy looking at different Leica M digital cameras in there- as well as images taken on good old film Leicas and even the S2? If all my shots will be moved from there to here: unless I pull out my m3 - I will no longer be able to participate in that thread?? Not entirely happy. In addition we now have various M8, MM, M240 and Non Camera Specific 'old glass' threads... a type of emergent 'camera apartheid'? This isn't necessary in the M lens forum- surely? Seems like the VTOG thread will only be of use to those shooting the M9, S2 or film cameras from here on in? Is the answer to have a different thread for every type of camera that can handle Leica glass? What next: 'the view through older glass on the Sony A7r' thread?

 

I only mention all this because the VTOG thread is my favourite on this forum... especially seeing as every single Leica lens I own is vintage ;-)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIC, I'd be very happy to have all the old lens threads merged into the 'VTOG' thread.

After all, they all belong to the lens sub-forum and, in this context, I'm more interested in seeing the rendering of a lens than knowing which camera the lens was mounted on.

Although the camera information is definitely an interesting one, particularly in terms of FF vs. cropped vs. monochrome sensor, it's easy to see as long as the posted pictured are properly captioned.

Just my 2c.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

M (Type 240) and cheap lenses....there I've said it. Love my battered Elmar 50mm /f3.5 and Elmar135mm f/4, and lets not forget a couple of excellent Voigtlander's (CV 75 f/2.5 and 50 f 1.5 being prime examples). But just lowered the bar somewhat and purchased a Jupiter 8. And it is good - sharp (enough) and luckily seems to nail focus.

 

Somehow getting results from cheap lenses is a tad more enjoyable than from spending (a very considerable) amount more on the usual suspects (of which I have to confess I am a ready participant).

 

Yes it is harder - but (for a hobbyist) very satisfying!

 

James

 

No offence to the mods but I think my original post (above) has been taken a bit out of context (it was merged with another thread I think). I never meant for it to be used as a thread for posting images - more a discussion on the use and merits of cheaper lenses on the M (from a light hearted point of view).

 

I'd be perfectly happy for it to be closed and all images using old lenses posted to the marvelous VTOG thread - which is also my favorite threads. I really don't see that it matters what M is used providing the poster identifies as such (obviously the EVF opens up more possibilities).

 

My apologies to Ecar, Farnz and jaques.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

James,

 

No apology necessary and no offence taken by me. Andreas (Admin) has indicated his preference for keeping the separate threads on older glass with images in so they'll stay as they are.

 

Pete.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That really is an evocative photo. I have come back to admire it several times.:)

Was htat the 35 2.8 or the 3.5 Summaron?

 

Thanks :) The lens is a beautiful mint f2.8 (1967?).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks :) The lens is a beautiful mint f2.8 (1967?).

 

Thought so. Mine is much earlier but also in fine condition: the sharpest 35mm M I have discovered, including an almost-as-good Zeiss 35 f2.8. I disabled that irritating infinity lock by holding back the sprung finger-nail catch and inserting a tiny sliver cut from a matchstick. This holds the gate open all the time. I see they are priced around £635 in the UK nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I just bought a used Elmar 135/4 from 1960 in prime condition, it actually looks like brand new outside. However, it has a tendency that the bayonet snaps to lock before it is correctly positioned, my M then claims there is 'no lens' mounted, and LV turns off. I had my local repair-shop send it to Solms for a possible repair or adjustment to the bayonet and it was returned with a 'this lens cannot be used on the M' note. That procedure cost me 100$ and left me somewhat baffled...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, that's odd. I have a 135mm Elmar from 1960 too, and it functions perfectly on the M, including with live view. I'm curious what the difference is.

 

Is your problem intermittent depending on how the lens was mounted, or does live view always fail with that lens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...