Guest malland Posted July 10, 2013 Share #41 Posted July 10, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) My understanding is that most people prefer, for reasons of safety and convenience prefer not to connect the camera through a USB port, but simply to insert the SD card into the card slot on the computer or to use a card reader to do so. —Mitch/Bangkok Bangkok Obvious [WIP] Eggleston said that he was "at war with the obvious"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 10, 2013 Posted July 10, 2013 Hi Guest malland, Take a look here M9 / M-E regretful purchase?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
AB007 Posted July 10, 2013 Share #42 Posted July 10, 2013 I have been enjoying using my M9 since 2010. The only reason for me to buy the M is to use my R lenses. Last month, my dealer told me he has the M (new with repaired lugs by Leica). I didn't buy it since the R adapter is not available yet M will be collecting dust without the R adapters. I don't care about the video. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted July 10, 2013 Share #43 Posted July 10, 2013 ... M will be collecting dust without the R adapters. .... I'm using an inexpensive third-party R to M adaptor in the interim and it does the job. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnew Posted July 10, 2013 Share #44 Posted July 10, 2013 I just bought an M9 in excellent condition. This is the opportunity the M240 created by putting the M9 on the second hand market faster. My initial intention was to have an M but the waiting time and the still not fully matured product pushed me towards the M9, with substantial financial help. I have the impression that M9 will remain as a unique product while the M240 will need to evolve to keep catching up with the rest of the market wishes. So, I can now wait for a few more years while growing with the M9. I had no R-lenses so the major advantage is not there for me. The important is what pictures we will be able to take.. Newnew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill W Posted July 11, 2013 Share #45 Posted July 11, 2013 I just bought an M9 in excellent condition. This is the opportunity the M240 created by putting the M9 on the second hand market faster. My initial intention was to have an M but the waiting time and the still not fully matured product pushed me towards the M9, with substantial financial help. I have the impression that M9 will remain as a unique product while the M240 will need to evolve to keep catching up with the rest of the market wishes. So, I can now wait for a few more years while growing with the M9. I had no R-lenses so the major advantage is not there for me. The important is what pictures we will be able to take.. Newnew Good for you, enjoy the M9. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yenlo Posted July 11, 2013 Share #46 Posted July 11, 2013 I bought an used M8 to cover the time until the M240 would be available. It turned out that the M8 really was a stubborn beast and more often than not i wasn´t able to get the picture i had in mind. And so i did the upgrade to the M9. March came and i wanted the M240 - badly. Then came the day my dealer called me and there i stood: M240 with a 35 Lux - a stroll in the park and white clouds turned out blue. Green trees went sickly yellowish aso. It was like 14 yrs of photography vanished within milliseconds. It all seemed wrong and i was deeply frustrated. Going home and there she was: my M9. A beauty in steel gray, knobs and wheels boiled down to perfect usability doing fascinating pictures without processing your butt off afterwards. But now, having spare money in the pocket the voices in my head are up again and demanding the 35 Lux FLE... i need it. Badly!!! :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjames9142 Posted July 11, 2013 Share #47 Posted July 11, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) The M market allowed me to buy a backup M9 body, because I work with cameras, not play with them. Also got a Monochrom. Couldn't ask for anything more. If I want to shoot video, I will go to the Japanese, who are light years ahead in this field. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfhrased Posted July 12, 2013 Share #48 Posted July 12, 2013 But now, having spare money in the pocket the voices in my head are up again and demanding the 35 Lux FLE... i need it. Badly!!! :-) How badly? I'm thinking of selling mine.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchfriis Posted July 12, 2013 Share #49 Posted July 12, 2013 Do you think there are many who purchased a m9 or M-E and regretted not waiting for the m240? Why or why not? No regrets whatsoever. I've had the M8 since 2007 and for quite a while I have wished for the full-frame experience. Then the rumours about the new M (10) started and I waited to see what Leica would come up with. After having seen the specs and having handled one in a shop I decided that all the improvements, changes and new features did not justify the additional cost for me. So 3 weeks ago I bought the M-E and I absolutely love it. And I think if I can't make good pictures with this camera a new M will not help me either. Oh, and I will keep the M8, it is still a great camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted July 12, 2013 Share #50 Posted July 12, 2013 a stroll in the park and white clouds turned out blue. Green trees went sickly yellowish.... .... fascinating pictures without processing your butt off afterwards. Simple fix, and it involves proper WB and profiling before processing, not after. The M9 had color issues when released, too, and those were equally fixable. In both cases, firmware and software profile updates eventually make things even easier. I would have been concerned about much different issues, if any. But to each his own. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
egrossman Posted July 12, 2013 Share #51 Posted July 12, 2013 I thought I would chime in here. I love my M9. I recently received my M240 and didn't think the EVF would be particularly useful to me. The thing is until actually you try it you don't realize how useful it is to focus those lenses with very shallow depth of field. The 10x magnification focus patch in the EVF is a godsend for getting critical focus on my 75mm Summilux. Clearly this is just one opinion, but before knocking the M240 as having features you don't need... all I'm saying is that you have to try it first to make an informed decision! Erik Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted July 13, 2013 Share #52 Posted July 13, 2013 And even if one never uses live view for taking pics, it can be very useful for determining if there is a focus calibration issue with the camera and/or lens. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pfhrased Posted July 13, 2013 Share #53 Posted July 13, 2013 The 10x magnification focus patch in the EVF is a godsend for getting critical focus on my 75mm Summilux. Is your Summilux calibrated correctly? Mine was a breeze to focus after a CLA using the focus patch (but dreadful before). Most of them are calibrated for film bodies.. Still, it's a totally valid point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
egrossman Posted July 13, 2013 Share #54 Posted July 13, 2013 Yes all of my lenses are calibrated correctly. Unfortunately my eyes are losing calibration as I enter middle age . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffry Abt Posted July 13, 2013 Share #55 Posted July 13, 2013 M9P... and I have been trying to decide whether to run with it or not. This would be my first rangefinder and I honestly would like to start shooting sooner rather than later. I suppose that really answers the question, but I am still curious to hear others impressions. I have a silver-chrome M9P. It is a joy to shoot with. If I did not shoot sports from time to time, I would sell all of my Nikon kit as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomv Posted July 13, 2013 Share #56 Posted July 13, 2013 Do you think there are many who purchased a m9 or M-E and regretted not waiting for the m240? Why or why not? NO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZDavid Posted July 13, 2013 Share #57 Posted July 13, 2013 Purchased M9 in 2011. I had an SD card error but seems to be OK with latest firmware. I don't think any digital camera will be as reliable as a film M, and even the latest models still have issues from time to time. I really like the fact, as posted earlier, that M8s on are simply digital rangefinder cameras. The main virtues of simplicity, manual control, and the ability to use outstanding optics remain unchanged. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bocaburger Posted July 14, 2013 Share #58 Posted July 14, 2013 I got my M9 in late 2010. For me, full frame and no IR filters were significant reasons for upgrading. However I find nothing compelling me to upgrade to the M240 at this time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David K Posted July 21, 2013 Share #59 Posted July 21, 2013 I've shot a lot of Kodachrome in my day and I've shot around 1,000 images with an M-E with a 35mm Lux lens. I'm way too new to Leica to have an opinion about the suggested similarity between the CCD chip and Kodachrome (although I liked Kodachrome), but I deliberately chose the M-E for its simplicity, and it is yielding images that I find very pleasing. The M is probably a wonderful camera, but it offers no enhancements that would make me doubt the choice of the M-E. It should provide me with years of stunning images and it is just so much FUN to use! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest malland Posted July 21, 2013 Share #60 Posted July 21, 2013 David, exactly what I think, except that I'm skeptical whether, after the M240 has a firmware upgrade and a better Lightroom profile, I'll like the color rendition as much as that of the M9/M-E. Actually, in February I decided to get an M-E for that reason, but a dealer in Paris had a new M9-P that was still at the promotional price that had ended on December 31. In euros, after the VAT refund, the cost came out to be a few hundred dollars more than that of the M-E; but I would have been just as happy with the M-E. —Mitch/Pak Nam Pran Bangkok Obvious [WIP] Eggleston said that he was "at war with the obvious"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.