Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some great photos but for the money I can't help but think a 5D mk3 makes more all round sense.

 

You'd probably have to add a Leica R 28-90 Vario Elmar to the 5D Mk 3 to create as versatile a zoom outfit - and to be able to use the Canon camera's images as Leica Society entries or for Leica Forum posts.

 

And the 28-90 Vario Elmar would cost more than the X Vario ... and the whole combo would weigh considerably more.

 

dunk

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd probably have to add a Leica R 28-90 Vario Elmar to the 5D Mk 3 to create as versatile a zoom outfit - and to be able to use the Canon camera's images as Leica Society entries or for Leica Forum posts.

 

And the 28-90 Vario Elmar would cost more than the X Vario ... and the whole combo would weigh considerably more.

 

dunk

My comment made as me (not an officer of the Leica Society). It would need a lens as well, which would make it a bit more expensive than the X Vario but a lot more flexible and for me at least the X Vario would essentially require the additional viewfinder.

 

What matters to me most is getting the image - not which sensor container I use to do that. If I can post it here or in TLS circles that may be a small bonus.

 

To be fair I took several pictures of the cricket match http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/sports-leisure-time/289681-hit-six.html on Saturday and the Leica shot was head and shoulders above the Canon one - BUT that was the one where the sun was shining. So overall I am still on the fence and thinking what to buy or if to buy at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ISO 1600 1/640sec f10 33.5mm (50.25 FF equiv.) - overcast lighting

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best wishes

 

dunk

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some low light photos taken in Winchester Cathedral with ISO set to AUTO (max 3200). Lighting is dim, variable and mixed. WB was set to AUTO. I didn't use flash. Developed normally in ACR - nothing drastic.

 

 

Thanks for posting; your pics have inspired me to plan a P'bor Cathedral interior walkabout with my X Vario ;)

 

dunk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For full details of set-up please see http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-x1-forum/290328-q-d-coin-photography-x-vario.html

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

All straight JPEGS with no post processing.

 

Best wishes

 

dunk

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds Building in London

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some postcards from Winchester taken in bright sunlight. Gently developed in ACR.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

28mm (equivalent) 1/400 at f/5.6 ISO 100

 

 

 

 

32mm (equivalent) 1/400 at f/7.1 ISO 100

 

 

 

 

28mm (equivalent) 1/160 at f/8 ISO 100

 

 

 

 

44mm (equivalent) 1/320 at f/7.1 ISO 100

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m posting this as an example of a JPEG straight from the camera with no further processing except resizing for this site and conversion to sRGB. On my screen the colour of this JPEG is spot-on. I think it’s impressive because these shades of pink are difficult to get right working with the raw file. I’m reasonably proficient at developing raw files in ACR but it took me some time to approach the colour accuracy of this JPEG. In fact, the camera made a better job of it than I did. I’d be interested to hear what other users think of the camera-processed JPEGs.

 

It’s rather enjoyable to have an under-rated camera with hidden talents. Using it is a voyage of discovery.

 

Alba rose Königin von Dänemark

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

JPEG (Adobe RGB) 70mm (equivalent) 1/125 at f/8 ISO 100

Edited by euston
  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful flower with the very subtle nuances !

 

It is funny, I also come from poster very recently another pink here of another variety :

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/attachments/leica-d-lux-digilux-v-lux/384016d1372186541-do-digilux-2-photos-have-distinctive-l1040378-rose...rose.jpg

 

But with its ancestor Leica Digilux 2 (and Elpro-D)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s a lovely picture, Guytou.

 

Interesting that you make the connection between the X Vario and the Digilux 2. Sean Reid does the same. Apparently, these cameras have a designer in common, so maybe it’s to be expected that they will also share some of the same picture-making qualities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s a lovely picture, Guytou.

 

Interesting that you make the connection between the X Vario and the Digilux 2. Sean Reid does the same. Apparently, these cameras have a designer in common, so maybe it’s to be expected that they will also share some of the same picture-making qualities.

 

I expected a current variation of Digilux 2, with in particular some pixels in more on the same sensor 2/3” and one more modern viewfinder.

But especially without modifying the exceptional optic of this Digilux 2 (Vario Summicron 28/90 - f.2/f2,4).

 

I will thus to think about at this X vario. But I am frustrated by the weak opening and the absence of viewfinder. Damage because the quality of the zoom appears excellent to me.

 

Guy

Edited by Guytou
Link to post
Share on other sites

I expected a current variation of Digilux 2, with in particular some pixels in more on the same sensor 2/3” and one more modern viewfinder.

But especially without modifying the exceptional optic of this Digilux 2 (Vario Summicron 28/90 - f.2/f2,4).

 

I will thus to think about at this X vario. But I am frustrated by the weak opening and the absence of viewfinder. Damage because the quality of the zoom appears excellent to me.

 

Guy

 

No manufacturer is likely to resurrect such a camera design especially as sensors and cameras and lenses have moved on a whole decade since the D2 was first available. And the D2 design was shared with the Panasonic DMC LC1 ... whereas the X Vario is a Leica original with no Panasonic counterpart. Leica seem committed to APS-C and FF for their own current cameras - as distinct from the smaller sensor PanaLeicas.

 

dunk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know all that well.

 

I wished of course a larger sensor, the such APS-C of this X Vario, a zoom of quality which it seems to have, but for the rest (diaphargme and vidwfinder) I always remain in waiting.

 

Perhaps I think of a purchase but that me prevented not from photographing while waiting…;)

 

Guy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ready...!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...