Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

6002, Planar 80, Tmax 400, D76 1:1

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Klaus,

 

Your eye for composition is consistently and frustratingly quite exceptional ;)

 

Thanks for the inspiration :)

 

J

 

I agree with J

Important  good eye and composition with "inspiration"  like an artist  

Very well captured all your pictures

Very nice Klaus

Thanks for posting

Rg

H.

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

6002, Planar 80, Tmax 400, D76 1:1

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love these Doc. Very, very beautiful. A painted photograph :)

 

Beautiful, Henry - This is my favourite so far - Thank you.

 

In the same impressionist style

 

 

Kodak Portra 160

M7- Apo Telyt 135 Asph-Tripod

 

I like the background , it's like a painting as some brush "touches"  :)

the definition is great with this Apo Telyt 135 , you can see spiderwebs :)

The "contre-jour"  gives a relief to poppies and wheat

 

attachicon.gifImage4popkod160lfhtfec++++950y.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

Thanks J , Eoin and JM for your thanks and nice comments :)

 

In the same style between "sharp" (a little), "blur" , "sun reflection" (gold aspect of wheat) and "red" color of poppies  ... :)

you can have several types of photos . Here I am in contre-jour .The color change depending on the direction of the camera.

You said "nuance" ?

 

 

Kodak Portra 160

(dev home lab 30°C)

M7- Apo Summicron 90 Asph

Tripod

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

From a trip a couple of years ago to Taos New Mexico.  We used to live just a few hours away and visited this church often.  It was once shot by Ansel Adams, although my photo cannot compare.  Plus-X rated at 100, Rodinal 50:1, Plustek scan, Leica M6, 50mm Summicron probably F8 with medium yellow filter.  Sure do miss that scanner.  

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

From a trip a couple of years ago to Taos New Mexico.  We used to live just a few hours away and visited this church often.  It was once shot by Ansel Adams, although my photo cannot compare.  Plus-X rated at 100, Rodinal 50:1, Plustek scan, Leica M6, 50mm Summicron probably F8 with medium yellow filter.  Sure do miss that scanner.  

Wayne very nice picture , beautiful contrast

Thanks

Rg

H.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

For Klaus who likes architecture and geometric lines  :)

 

 

Eiffel Tower Paris

and in contrejour

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

one of the 4 pillars of the tower

 

 

Kodak TX400-MP-50 Lux Asph

D76 dil 1:1 - Nikon Coolscan 5000

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

and to conclude "à la manière de" Monet

in film , the last poppy  picture

 

 

Kodak Portra 160

Leica M7- Apo Summicron 90 Asph

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

 

 

 

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a roll of AgfaVista200 in my M3.  Took a few shots (all using a hand-held meter), then left the camera for a few weeks.  After going back, I forget it was 200, and metered for 400.  I had the film developed as a normal 200.  I expected the latter pictures to be poor, but in the event, I find I far prefer them to the ones shot and developed at 200.  Does anyone else have a similar reaction to this film?  It's the first time I've used it (a £1 bargain).  Two pictures, the first shot and developed at 200.  The second metered as 400, and developed as 200:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuji Provia 100F :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks J , Eoin and JM for your thanks and nice comments :)

 

In the same style between "sharp" (a little), "blur" , "sun reflection" (gold aspect of wheat) and "red" color of poppies  ... :)

you can have several types of photos . Here I am in contre-jour .The color change depending on the direction of the camera.

You said "nuance" ?

 

 

Kodak Portra 160

(dev home lab 30°C)

M7- Apo Summicron 90 Asph

Tripod

 

attachicon.gifImage2popppieskod160m7lfhtfec+++++tri950.jpg

 

Best

Henry

I like this one . It look like a painting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Kentishrev,

 

Welcome to the Forum.

 

Nice photos both.

 

Many modern negative films will give a perfectly fine exposure when used within 1 stop more or 1 stop less than their assigned exposure value. 

 

There are also other variables involved as a factor of how a meter is used. Whether built in or hand held. Whether incident or reflected light.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica M6, 50mm, max 400

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks a lot Gary,

I shall think about it seriously !

 

Meanwhile I hope you get to see the results from your SWC soon, the quality of  its lens  is truely outstanding !

 

One more from Taiz Yemen, with Ektachrome 1600 and the Hexar AF

 

7484450280_64676eab26_b.jpg

Taiz, street at night. by JM__, on Flickr

 

Love this JM

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a roll of AgfaVista200 in my M3.  Took a few shots (all using a hand-held meter), then left the camera for a few weeks.  After going back, I forget it was 200, and metered for 400.  I had the film developed as a normal 200.  I expected the latter pictures to be poor, but in the event, I find I far prefer them to the ones shot and developed at 200.  Does anyone else have a similar reaction to this film?  It's the first time I've used it (a £1 bargain).  Two pictures, the first shot and developed at 200.  The second metered as 400, and developed as 200:

 

I agree with Michael

When you push film 200 Isos to 400 Isos , you increase slightly the sensibility

The time development is the same for 200 or 400 in process C41.

Both pictures have nice colors

 

...  and I forget to welcome you to our thread :)

Best

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agfa Vista 200 pushes really well with corresponding development. I've shot it at EI 800 with good results (some posted a while back in this thread).

 

I haven't tried it at a higher EI and then developed at box speed but I've done that with Portra 400 and had completely useable results. One stop under-exposure is usually not much for b&w or colour negative film. That said, generally colour negative films benefits from more light and then developing at box speed. I shoot virtually all my colour neg rolls at one or two stops over-exposure - ISO 400 film is shot at EI100 and ISO 160 at EI80 - and have them developed at box speed. With ISO 400 films that's really quite convenient because it lets me use it during daytime with more narrow DOF and lighter shadows (good for scanning) and benefit during indoor or night-time photography from the speed.

 

Had a roll of AgfaVista200 in my M3.  Took a few shots (all using a hand-held meter), then left the camera for a few weeks.  After going back, I forget it was 200, and metered for 400.  I had the film developed as a normal 200.  I expected the latter pictures to be poor, but in the event, I find I far prefer them to the ones shot and developed at 200.  Does anyone else have a similar reaction to this film?  It's the first time I've used it (a £1 bargain).  Two pictures, the first shot and developed at 200.  The second metered as 400, and developed as 200:

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...