Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Robert, treasure the shot with Mum, print it!!

Love the picture of your wife and iPhone.

 

I just did and I have to tell you...the scan just doesn't do it justice! The print is amazing. Taking a picture of it really doesn't convey it either but I did it anyway.

 

Thanks for the kind comments.

 

26976460596_03e4db557f_h.jpg

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

News Seller lower Manhattan NYC -- Adox CMS 20 Leica MA Voigtlander 21mm Ultron

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Porst CTL with a 1,8/50 on Fuji C200 (Scan is not the best)

 

attachicon.gifPorst CTL_Jan15_05.jpg

 

Monastery of Andechs, Bavaria

 

A nice view of that place in winter. I suspect this picture was taken on your way towards Andechs, as I seem to remember that after visiting the Beer-garden facilities in the monastry there, visitors generally are walking not so steady... ;)

 

Rgds

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

M6, Elmar-M, HP2 Super

 

 

Pointing

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

AhAh clin d'oeil my friend! 

super

To day Today I introduce you the Reunion Island
Welcome to Reunion Island

In the foreground,mangroves component of this wild coast of South Island
In the background, Indian Ocean full Antarctic South Pole

attachicon.gif3/5/6/7/1/467160.attach

Kodak PanF 50 Isos

Best
Henry

Edited by janorun974
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello, 

 

Street view from Santiago ... 

 

35mm summicron asph Ilford HP5 (expired)  post-50356-0-51694500-1463237450_thumb.j

 

Glad you join us Jean  and you are welcome

As I see , you like film in b&w with your M7 a great camera a faster as said Raymond  Depardon ...

Regards

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just did and I have to tell you...the scan just doesn't do it justice! The print is amazing. Taking a picture of it really doesn't convey it either but I did it anyway.

 

Thanks for the kind comments.

 

26976460596_03e4db557f_h.jpg

 

You are right to print this picture . These are moments you never forget

Beautiful age your mom and healthy :)

I agree with Chris and Trev :)

Rg

H

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reunion Island for Jean and Normandy in Kodak TX

 

 

MP-35 Summilux Asph

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Normandy beach of Arromanches

 

 

Rg

H

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Adam and Neil,

 

It's not an "artifact or schmootz"  of film , it's normal and natural IMO

I have this on my pictures of sea or on land  :)  like here

It's the shadow and reflection of clouds and light which gives it a little purple

 

Versailles Castle KP 400-M7-50 LA

 

attachicon.gifImage1versfujm7ciplfht+++-Modifier.jpg

 

Dunkerque port

 

attachicon.gifdunkkodektlfhtfec+++900.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

 

Yes, it's normal.  It's an excess of ultraviolet light recording on the film.  I don't remember it being quite such an issue 30 years ago... whether it's the ozone layer depletion or a change in the emulsions is probably up for grabs; but a UV/Haze filter will deal with most of it.

 

Henry, Hepcat,

 

If you look carefully at the picture Adam posted on the top of page 750, you will notice approximately 1/3 from the left in the sky a brownish stain in the sky (and several others in other places). I cannot easily explain this as an artefact of any light or optics. As the film in question is the Cinestill 50, my guess is that this stain could be a remnant of the Remjet backing, that was either insufficiently removed, or somehow marred the emulsion side of the film. 

But as this is all guesswork, perhaps Adam, you could contact the supplier of the film and ask for clarification?

 

Best regards

 

Christoph

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Adam and Neil,

 

It's not an "artifact or schmootz"  of film , it's normal and natural IMO

I have this on my pictures of sea or on land  :)  like here

It's the shadow and reflection of clouds and light which gives it a little purple

 

Versailles Castle KP 400-M7-50 LA

 

attachicon.gifImage1versfujm7ciplfht+++-Modifier.jpg

 

Dunkerque port

 

attachicon.gifdunkkodektlfhtfec+++900.jpg

 

Best

Henry

 

 

Some of the most famous people the world has ever known have walked these stairs. Currently closed for much needed renovations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotel_Chelsea

 

SWC/M - TMAX400

 

"Hotel Chelsea"

 

26937302171_1f7e6a4870_c.jpg

2016-05-08-0009E by Marc Tauber, on Flickr

 

 

Yes, it's normal.  It's an excess of ultraviolet light recording on the film.  I don't remember it being quite such an issue 30 years ago... whether it's the ozone layer depletion or a change in the emulsions is probably up for grabs; but a UV/Haze filter will deal with most of it.

love it, Marc!

 

Henry, Hepcat,

 

If you look carefully at the picture Adam posted on the top of page 750, you will notice approximately 1/3 from the left in the sky a brownish stain in the sky (and several others in other places). I cannot easily explain this as an artefact of any light or optics. As the film in question is the Cinestill 50, my guess is that this stain could be a remnant of the Remjet backing, that was either insufficiently removed, or somehow marred the emulsion side of the film. 

But as this is all guesswork, perhaps Adam, you could contact the supplier of the film and ask for clarification?

 

Best regards

 

Christoph

 

 

 

Henry and Hepcat - I think that you are not looking close enough at my image.  The schmootz is not just in the clouds, but it is ALL OVER the image.  Just look at the sand and you will see color variations in the yellow-orange range.  This has nothing to do with the light and everything o do with the particular batch of film.   

I am still up to my eyeballs with scanning my rolls and want to finish with all of the Cinestill 50s before making any definitive conclusions.  But so far I have scanned 5 rolls of this film and only one has anything even closely resembling this yellowish/brown blotches and bubbles.  

Henry - the images that you posted do not present the same issue that mine or Mark's do.  It is a completely different issue.  

Schmootz is schmootz...

Eventually I will be sending a note to Cinestill.  But I am off to London tomorrow for the week and will likely be delayed...

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Friends, 

 

My uncle cooking dinner on wood fire - M7 28mm summicron ilford xp2

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by janorun974
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

So lovely, yet so schmootzy (see, e.g., the sky).... :angry:

M-A, 35mm lux fle, Cinestill 50  :(

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Well I dodged the bullet again this morning. Last night I got a call from the model to say that she had to work today so she wouldn't be able to join me for a photo shoot. I told my wife that instead of shooting the model we could go to the morocrana palace in Putrajaya and shoot that during sunrise. 

So off we popped with 2 backs loaded with film and spare film in the bag. I shot the first roll of B&W and went to change over to a color film so rewound the film and opened up the back to find it was empty...........what a frigging wally.........just as well the model canceled, imagine how that would of looked, put your hands there, bend your knees a bit, oh yes i like that pose then 12 shots later showing the model an empty film back and telling her to do it all again :( :( :(

Question

Is there a way to tell if the film back has film in it or is empty???

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So lovely, yet so schmootzy (see, e.g., the sky).... :angry:

M-A, 35mm lux fle, Cinestill 50  :(

attachicon.gifbeach2.jpg

 

And not just the sky. There's a stain running down near the right edge. I'd go with insufficient remjet removal.  Definitely bad film.  What a shame..great picture otherwise.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...