Jump to content

The joy of One camera One Lens


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Indeed..... rant mode on..... I really don't understand why anyone wants to take photos of a gig on a cameraphone from the middle of the crowd. Assuming they even end up with an image that isn't a blur, or a patch of blown highlights in the darkness, what do they do with them?

 

They stand their watching a live gig from the small LCD of their smartphone, instead of putting the damn thing away and just enjoying the event.

 

 

I read a recent article in a medical psychology journal recently about this. The article discussed a new phenomena of a need to have personal experiences "validated" by others ie upload to Facebook (immediately), collect "Likes" from friends. Only when validated by friends is the experience complete. They cannot enjoy without the connection.

 

The article went on to describe how (young) people are losing the ability to disconnect, and are becoming more and more dependent on others to confirm they are "OK". A dangerous trend. Worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Im relatively young and I stopped to use Faceboo, twitter .

 

New life awaits for me.:D:D:D

 

On another hand, I believe films will get popular as youngsters seek out for therapy purpose. the curve points up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I will be going to NYC for New Year with the family and plan again on going with one camera and lens.

The only thing I am debating is whether to take same M4 and 35 Cron or my trusted old Rolleiflex which I have been enjoying recently....

Will probably decide an hour or two before departing, have lots of film for both.

 

Keep you posted as to what I decide for and will post some snaps on my return..:)

 

Best

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going back and fourth between 28 and 35 right now and will hopefully settle with one of the two for most of my work somewhere in the future (50 is my supertlele and gets mounted not too often). Right now I try to stick to the 28.

 

But I find the process of finding your favourite focal lengh also very rewarding artistically, even if it adds some weight to your bag. Makes you really think about FOV, perspective etc. during the shooting and analysing process.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be going to NYC for New Year with the family and plan again on going with one camera and lens.

The only thing I am debating is whether to take same M4 and 35 Cron or my trusted old Rolleiflex which I have been enjoying recently....

Will probably decide an hour or two before departing, have lots of film for both.

 

Keep you posted as to what I decide for and will post some snaps on my return..:)

 

Best

 

Andy

 

Depends whether you intend to emulate Elliot Erwitt or Vivian Maier! ;)

 

PS - whichever camera you choose, I look forward to seeing the results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love my M3 with CV Heliar 50/2. Use it 95% of the time. But I always keep a Elmarit 90/4 in the bag.

Yes, the Heliar does have nice character. While I normally use a Summicron more on my M9, I realize a few shots taken with the Heliar stir stronger emotions. It is a lens that works better with practice, so you understand its properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I will be going to NYC for New Year with the family and plan again on going with one camera and lens.

The only thing I am debating is whether to take same M4 and 35 Cron or my trusted old Rolleiflex which I have been enjoying recently....

Will probably decide an hour or two before departing, have lots of film for both.

 

We have been talking about visiting NYC later this year especially after Hermann Landshoff Exhibition in Munich yesterday. So don't forget to let us in on your (film) camera gear. Appreciate it.:)

 

Col

Link to post
Share on other sites

The outside of the viewfinder frame on the M4 is not a million miles away from being correct for a 28mm. I have just had a total overhaul on mine done by Peter at CRR in Luton, including new frame mask and it looks and feels almost like it did in 1967.

 

Wilson

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have the m6 classic, m4 and m9 -- and nothing beats the sound of the m4 shutter. it is, to my aged ears, perfection…..

 

I am told this is because all the gears, cams etc on the M4 are brass or bronze. The cost accountants arrived between the M4 and M4-P/M4-2 and demanded economies. This meant some of the gears were changed to either moulded nylon or steel stampings, which don’t run as sweetly.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

>> Wilson

 

This only had to do with demands to withstand additional gearstress after introducing

the M-motorwinder. Exchanging bronze with tougher metals during M4-2-production

also changed the feel of the "gearbox", sadly.

 

No nylon in there, AFAIK

 

Best

GEORG

 

Georg,

 

Thanks for that info. I believe the nylon or plastic gears are in the film counter part of the mechanism but this may only be from M6 onwards.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Georg,

 

Thanks for that info. I believe the nylon or plastic gears are in the film counter part of the mechanism but this may only be from M6 onwards.

 

Wilson

 

My understanding is that only the later M6 have plastic gears in the film counter. You can google the exact change in parts. It's during the mid 1990s, but it was never officially stated when, so you just have to guess a little. There are serial number lists stating metal and plastic gears. I think my was just before any change was noticed and it's from 1995 I think.

 

One bigger problem I hear less about, but is in actual fact a much bigger issue in my experience is the metal alloy mix in the top-plates of M6 cameras. I was told early M6 cameras were more collectible, but most of the examples I saw had massive amounts of bubbling due to corrosion under the black chrome finish. Leica ballsed up a lot of M6 cameras early on and I always thought it was best to go as late as possible in the run as you dared to avoid it.

 

In my books small modifications like gear material changes make very little difference overall. What you tend to get is a swings and round-a-bouts situation, where one change gives you one benefits and loses another. In my experience it really boils down to how much you like the feel, sound and action of a particular camera. Even saying that it tends only to be Leica nerds that actually think that is important. I for one have never ever given much thought to the butteriness of winders, or sounds of shutters. It doesn't effect in any way at all your photos. I've used M3s which felt like crap and M6s that felt amazing. Most of the feel aspect comes down to years or use and maintenance. It's far more likely the type of life a camera has lead determines feel much more then the model itself, because from the M3 to MP there isn't much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...