Jump to content

R serviceability?


bull40

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm about to call or email Leica Service in NJ sometime this week to inquire, but thought someone here might know offhand. Is Leica still supporting repair services for the R series, and if so, to what extent? I'm curious as to things like cam and ROM upgrades on lenses to CLAs and actual repairs on bodies. Do we know what their plans are for servicing long term, and perhaps what models will they no longer touch? I'll be posting their current response to me as I get it, but was just wondering if anyone here had recent information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect the answer will be "it depends".

 

Some parts are no doubt unavailable, and then there's the economics of it. Would you pay €1000 say for a repair to an R4 body?

 

Local camera repairers are probably better - they will use spares from other cameras and generally charge much less than Leica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm about to call or email Leica Service in NJ sometime this week to inquire, but thought someone here might know offhand. Is Leica still supporting repair services for the R series, and if so, to what extent? I'm curious as to things like cam and ROM upgrades on lenses to CLAs and actual repairs on bodies. Do we know what their plans are for servicing long term, and perhaps what models will they no longer touch? I'll be posting their current response to me as I get it, but was just wondering if anyone here had recent information.

 

Some repairs will be uneconomical and this more than anything else will determine how long R equipment can be serviced. I suspect that the $300 main body casting for an R4sP they had 10 years ago is still sitting in their inventory because the cost of installing it let alone the parts cost is more than an R4sP is worth.

 

(Note: don't over-stress the tripod socket of your R4 through R7 bodies.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, economic feasibility does play a valid role in this equation. But at some point, good, clean and working examples may become scarce. I've shot with these since 1985 and there is nothing I like using better. At this point, I plan on expanding and upgrading my R arsenal and riding them into the film sunset. I guess I would like some assurance that after sinking more money into an already dead and becoming more scarce system, that I'll have access to servicing to keep them running into the foreseeable future. But, as with most things in life, "you pays your money and you takes your chances." ;-)

Wildlight- I've never had any failure of any kind with any of my R bodies over the years. Now, the largest and heaviest lenses I've ever stressed the tripod socket with were the old 70-210 and the newer 80-200, and the additional weight of some pretty heavy and bulky shoe mount strobes. I do baby my equipment, despite using it frequently and sometimes frantically.

I'm thinking I've grown concerned recently reading the reports here on the forum regarding M8 owners being told by Leica that they are, in some situations, already unrepairable. If Leica is entering the age of planned obsolescence (or at least even short lifespan due to electronic parts unavailability just a few years out of production) of their premier system, I can't see them going to great lengths to support the defunct R system. It will be an interesting response, I'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Part of me believes the old Leicaflex series will more serviceable then the newer R series, because they were made during the time when the tech tinkered and adjusted, as opposed to replacement of the broken part. But a strong selling point for Leica has always been the availability of spare parts for discontinued models. Last year I got a new prism installed in an old '72 Leicaflex SL. Who would of thought that was possible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides the prism de-silvering (also very common on the Canon FT and Pellix of the 1960s vintage), the SL CDS cell is a common problem, and these are hard to find now. The cells lose impedance due to moisture penetration, and so become non-linear in low light. DAG replaced one for me last year, and restored the meter to its full rated range of operation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...