Jump to content

"tis a puzzlement"


dickgrafixstop

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Will the next D-Lux be a "6" or a "7"?

The new Panasonic version was announced today with a sweet looking summilux

lens - well technically a f1.4 to 2.3 zoom (24-90 equivalent) - and a few other bells

and whistles.

Now the wait til Photokina? of can our wizards of Solms (or whoever they contract

it out to) make the minor changes to the microcode to announce it sooner?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the history of the numbering goes:-

 

Leica D-Lux: No panasonic equivalent (AFAIK)

 

Leica D-Lux 2: Equivalent Panasonic LX

 

Leica D-Lux 3: Equivalent Panasonic LX2

 

Leica D-Lux 4: Equivalent Panasonic LX3

 

Leica D-Lux 5: Equivalent Panasonic LX5

 

Based on no evidence whatsoever I assumed that Panasonic had skipped 4 to get in line with the Leica numbering.

Looks like I was wrong :confused:

 

A puzzlement indeed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why won't Leica be honest and just call it 'The fools Panasonic LX-7'?

With the inference that you think everyone who buys one instead of the LX-7 is a fool? It's not yet been released so there's no idea of the price or the relative packages. Who's the fool?

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...